GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

change of the guard

Accountability guru Liebman out; former principal will fill spot

James Liebman. (Photo courtesy of NYC Department of Education)

James Liebman. (Photo courtesy of NYC Department of Education)

James Liebman, the law professor mastermind behind the Bloomberg administration’s school accountability system, is resigning, Chancellor Joel Klein just announced.

A former principal, Shael Polakow-Suransky, will replace Liebman on an “interim acting” basis. The swap transitions the Office of Accountability to the hands of a longtime educator from those of a outsider criticized for having no teaching experience.

The accountability system constructed by Liebman, a law professor at Columbia University, changed the tone of many schools in the city, sometimes dramatically. The new focus on improving students’ test scores drew both sharp criticism from some city educators who said it narrowed curriculum and created incentives to cheat — and a carnival of visitors from around the country and abroad hoping to model the system in their schools.

The matrix of tools built by Liebman includes report cards that assign each school a letter grade; quality reviews that evaluate schools’ use of test score data to inform teaching; a data warehouse searchable by teachers and, now, parents; so-called “formative assessments” that help teachers diagnose students’ strengths and weaknesses before state test time; and a “data inquiry team” system that encourages teachers to make curriculum decisions by referring to students’ test scores.

Liebman will return to teaching at Columbia full-time, but will continue to work on special projects for the Department of Education, Klein’s press release said. Neither Liebman nor Klein could be reached for an immediate comment.

Updates to come. Here’s the full press release:

CHANCELLOR KLEIN ANNOUNCES THE RESIGNATION OF JAMES LIEBMAN AND THE APPOINTMENT OF SHAEL POLAKOW-SURANSKY AS INTERIM-ACTING CHIEF ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICER

Schools Chancellor Joel I. Klein today announced the resignation of James Liebman as Chief Accountability Officer and the appointment of Shael Polakow-Suransky as interim-acting Chief Accountability Officer, effective July 20. Mr. Liebman, who is also a professor at Columbia Law School, will resume teaching full time while undertaking special projects for the Department of Education. Mr. Polakow-Suransky currently serves as Deputy Chief Schools Officer and collaborated closely with Mr. Liebman in designing the Department’s accountability tools and achievement resources.

“Jim has led some of the most revolutionary work in public education in recent years, work that has helped accelerate the progress our students and schools are making,” Chancellor Klein said. “People from school districts around the world regularly visit New York City to learn about the accountability tools he has developed. Jim will be greatly missed, but both he and I agree that Shael is the right person to continue this important work.”

Before becoming the Department’s first Chief Accountability Officer in January 2006, Mr. Liebman built a distinguished career as a public interest lawyer and a law professor. A public school parent, he has written and taught extensively in the fields of public education and public institutional reform.

As Chief Accountability Officer, he has led the Department’s efforts to provide parents and educators with information they can use to improve student results and hold schools and educators accountable for helping all students make academic progress. He has built the Division of Accountability and Achievement Resources and overseen the development of the most comprehensive set of school accountability tools and achievement resources in the nation, including:

  • Progress Reports, which grade schools based on the amount of academic progress their students make each year;
  • Quality Reviews, which provide an analysis of how well each school is organized to respond to the learning needs of its students;

(More)

  • the annual School Survey—the largest survey in the country other than the U.S. Census—which asks parents, teachers, and students what their schools are doing well and how the schools can improve student learning;

  • a comprehensive and flexible package of no-stakes Periodic Assessments that educators can use to assess students’ strengths and needs, diagnose areas in which instruction is not working for particular students, and tailor lessons to the match the learning needs of each child; 

  • the Achievement Reporting and Innovation System (ARIS), a data system that gives administrators, teachers, and families access to critical information about students’ academic performance as well as to lesson plans and other resources and collaboration tools they can use to improve performance; 

  • Inquiry Teams, groups of teachers and administrators in every school that develop strategies to help struggling students;

  • and enhanced data verification, integrity, and governance systems to assure the accuracy and usability of data for educators, families, and the public.

Mr. Polakow-Suransky has compiled a long record of raising student achievement in the New York City public schools during the last 15 years. He is currently the Department’s Deputy Chief Schools Officer, helping to oversee the work of the School Support Organizations and Integrated Service Centers. He began his career as a math and social studies teacher. In 2001, he became the founding principal of Bronx International High School, which has served as a model for the development of many of the City’s new small schools. He has also served as a Leadership Academy facilitator, the Deputy Chief Executive Officer for the Office of New Schools, and the Chief Academic Officer for Empowerment Schools, which he helped build into the Department’s largest School Support Organization.

Mr. Polakow-Suransky holds a bachelor’s degree in education and urban studies from Brown University and a master’s degree in educational leadership from the Bank Street College of Education. He recently graduated from the Broad Superintendents Academy.

###

Contact: David Cantor / Andrew Jacob (212) 374-5141

  • http://www.classsizematters.org leonie haimson

    Let us remember that this man had no qualifications for the job, and proved this repeatedly through his blunders. The progress reports were widely derided as unreliable and statistically untenable; the quality reviews were an expensive waste of time and paperwork, and were ignored by the DOE when deciding which schools to close and which schools to commend; ARIS was a super-expensive super-mugging by IBM, according to tech experts who found it laughable how DOE was taken for a ride.

    The surveys were badly designed, counted for only a small percentage of school grades, and yet because principals were terrified of bad results, parents were pressured into giving favorable reviews for fear their schools would otherwise be punished. And the top priority of parents on these surveys — class size reduction — was repeatedly derided by Liebman et. al. as a goal not worthy of the DOE to pursue.

    Under his leadership or lack thereof, the Accountability office has continued to mushroom with high priced educrats, though it has a severe vacuum when it comes to anyone who actually understands education, statistics or the limitations of data. The whole ostensible point of the data collected through ARIS and through the “data inquiry teams” — to allow “differentiated instruction” to occur, is prevented by the fact that overcrowding and class size continues to increase.

    No matter how much data is available — even assuming it is statistically reliable, which it is often not — the best way to allow differentiated instruction to occur is to reduce class size.

    And let us not forget Liebman’s terrified run out the back door of City Hall chambers in order to escape the petitions that Time out from Testing had collected — even though Councilmember Jackson had politely requested that he exit the front door so he could receive those petitions with the respect and grace that they deserved.

  • Dissenter

    I do not agree that “parents were pressured into giving favorable reviews for fear their schools would otherwise be punished” although your written statement is so rife with generalizations, this is the one I had to respond to. I have sent in every one of the parent surveys I was sent by the DOE and I can assure you, I filled them out based on my impression of my son’s education and how the school was doing overall. I was not pressured by any school official to fill my survey out a particular way. I find that the generalization you use is more of the Bush tactic he perfected: if you say something enough times, it must be true. I might also say that class size reduction is not my top priority though you’ve generalized that it is in fact every parent’s priority. It is make sure my child has a high quality teacher each and every year and saving his school’s enrichment programs.

  • Michael M.

    Re “…I find that the generalization you use is more of the Bush tactic he perfected: if you say something enough times, it must be true.”

    Irony is alive and well. Or maybe I’m the only one getting weekly mailers about how much Mike Bloomberg is doing for the middle class, loaded with nominal data… and providing NO sources for same.

    I don’t think Leonie was suggesting that every parent was so pressured, but I too have heard the same, dare I say, in general.

    Class size reduction need not be ANY parent’s priority — it’s the law of the land in New York State; one that Bloomberg has spent the last seven years appealing, and Klein has spent the last seven years ignoring.

  • Michael M.

    Re Jim Liebman:

    Despite protests from a number of quarters that he reduce the weight of the “progress” metric, and increase the weight of the “performance” metric… heading into the second year of the Progress Reports he did the opposite. The corker was he said he did so after consultation with CEC’s. Sheesh.

    On the other hand, Jim Liebman deserves angel’s wings for his work on death penalty cases and the horrendous degree of error:

    “The report examined 5,760 capital cases between 1973 and 1995 and concludes that American capital sentences are persistently and systematically fraught with error that seriously undermines their reliability. The report reveals that serious error has reached epidemic proportions in capital cases. More than two out of every three capital judgments reviewed by the courts during the 23 year study period were found to be seriously flawed.”
    http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/node/99

    Accountability, indeed. To me, the contrast between the two realms proves the case that one should not be allowed to grade one’s own work.

  • http://www.classsizematters.org leonie haimson

    Dissenter: you ought to read more carefully. I did not “generalize” that class size reduction “is in fact every parent’s priority.” I wrote that class size reduction was “the top priority of parents on these [parent] surveys” as they have been every year they have been given. Check it out yourself if you doubt me.

    And indeed, it has been widely reported and experienced by many parents that they experienced intense pressure from principals, parent coordinators and the like to fill out the parent surveys and give favorable reviews to their schools. Lucky you that you haven’t noticed.

  • Socrates

    Leonie’s right, and it’s too bad that those who have a vested financial interest in the hiring of more teachers have duped the world into thinking that lower class sizes work better than they do, despite all evidence to the contrary. It’s conveniently kept much of the heat off the unions and the other enemies of reform, because they know class size reduction is the most expensive, and thus unrealistic, reform, with the least payoff. It sounds credible, because every teacher wants a smaller class, but what parents are not told is that by lowering class size, districts have to dip deeper into the teacher pool, down to all the people who couldn’t get a job when class sizes were large. This lowers the quality of the average teacher, which is not an effective reform when you consider that actual studies say that teacher quality is the biggest contributor to student success.

  • Pogue

    As did the editorial staff of the Daily News, I give Jim Liebman a “A”. A as in Asics, which are very good running sneakers when sprinting away from and abandoning the parents you supposedly were working for in NYC’s education system. On your mark, get set, go!

  • Dissenter

    Pogue I think you have to get away from the notion that only folks who are willing to work a very long time in the school system can contribute anything worthwhile to it. That’s part of the shrill that ‘educators’ try to sell, that only experienced people can matter in children’s education. I do not know Jim Liebman but if he had anything to do with introducing report cards and surveys into the school system, his contribute was tremendously positive. No longer do I have ao rely on “InsideSchools” or playground talk to know what’s going on at school. Each year schools get a grade, as well they should.

  • Pogue

    I admire anyone who sticks with their profession because it is work that they think is extremely important…that would be most teachers. All teachers start out new and learn from the get-go. Some don’t like it and leave, some are removed early if they’re not very good, (that’s the principal’s job), and some continue throughout their lives and help thousands of kids along the way. Don’t put words in my mouth. I never used the word “only”, nor made the point you referred to about teacher contributions.

    My point was Jim Liebman and the DOE’s simplistic letter grade system was poor. It is mostly based on data, (numbers juked?), and very little % of school environment. Grades based on surveys? Please. Honesty is the best policy, but it surely isn’t the DOE’s policy.

  • Michael M.

    The Daily News gets an F on Fact-Checking.

    And an A on ASS-essing the Emperor’s New Clothes.

    Or maybe they get to have pizza with Joel Klein and Alan Alda if they’re nice.

    The sad, simple — and suppressed — truth is that the School Progress Reports were EASILY proven to be a “random letter generator.” Easily and repeatedly.

  • Michael M.

    Hi Socrates,

    The debate on whether class size matters was settled by the highest court of New York State over seven years ago. Time to start building schools and hiring teachers.

    And that was true BEFORE the “Boomberg” years.

    How so you conclude that hiring more teachers, by definition, means you are now hiring teachers any less capable next year than the ones you might have hired last year. You make it seem as if the hiring process has a crystal ball. I say all it provides previously hired teachers is an additional year of OTJ training. And given the economy’s nose dive, next year’s crop might be more talented than last year’s, no?

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Feb. 10: You’re invited!

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

45 comments so far today

Our Twitter Updates

  • ” you don't want to come to class? Have a packet. You don't like your teacher? Have a packet” - @leoniehaimson 1 hr ago
  • .@leonileoniehaimson brings letters from anonymous teachers with damning tales.of credit recovery: giving out CR ”packets” like skittles.. 1 hr ago
  • At credit recovery town hall hosted by Regents. Testimony so far by principal, and 2 former teachers. Principal support; teachers critical 1 hr ago
  • Our report about the city's decision to keep two schools open, complete w/ co-location worries & political speculation: http://t.co/RO59PMh1 2 hrs ago
  • Chancellor Walcott about Wadleigh and KAPPA VII: "While these two schools continue to struggle, what we learned is that they are also... 3 hrs ago
  • More updates...

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  
?>