GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

big ideas

A culture shift in special education urged after internal review

Special education advocates are giving early praise to recommendations released today that would transform schools’ approach to students with special needs. The recommendations, which Chancellor Joel Klein endorsed, center on integrating students with special needs into the city’s ongoing school reforms.

Garth Harries, a department official who is starting a new job in New Haven, Conn., on Monday, authored the recommendations following a months-long review of the city’s special education offerings.

Actually implementing the plans will be left to a new top-level administrator who will be responsible for nearly a quarter of the system’s students. Laura Rodriguez, a longtime Bronx educator who currently heads one of the support organizations that principals can choose to join, will become the city’s first Chief Achievement Officer for Special Education and English Language Learners.

Rodriguez will be one of only seven people reporting directly to the chancellor, making the needs of nearly 250,000 disabled students and ELLs “visible and transparent at the cabinet level” for the first time, Klein said.

Maria Santos, the current head of the ELLs office, and whoever is appointed to replace Linda Wernikoff, until this week the city’s top special education administrator, will both report to Rodriguez, whose expertise is in supporting ELLs. Rodriguez’s top deputy, Dov Rokeach, started out as a special education teacher in 1972.

A member of the city’s special education parent advisory group said the pair’s different areas of expertise is worrisome. “That means a division of the workload: Rodriguez gets ELLs, Rokeach gets special ed,” said Ellen McHugh. “She has direct access to the chancellor, he does not.”

A department spokesman, David Cantor, said that the department is also planning to replace Wernikoff, rather than letting Rokeach or others absorb her responsibilities.

Advocates roundly decried Harries’s appointment to review special education earlier this year, saying he lacked the experience to evaluate such a complex system. They were kinder today after Harries privately briefed them on his report. A spokeswoman for a special education advocacy coalition, the ARISE Coalition, said that Harries appears to have taken what he heard during his “listening tours” to heart.

“I’m encouraged by them. It’s clear to me that he listened to everybody, including the advocacy community,” Maggie Moroff said about the recommendations. “There’s not everything I would like to see in there, but there’s a ton.”

The most important elements of the report, Moroff said, are its emphasis on parent engagement and its recognition that children should be grouped according to their needs.

Currently, schools rigidly follow recommendations from students’ educational plans, which make requirements such as having a classroom with 12 students for one teacher and one paraprofessional, or giving a student a certain number of hours of extra help with a special education teacher. Under the new framework, which Moroff called “really, really forward-thinking,” a school might group students more creatively. For instance, it could offer a class for students who all need a certain kind of reading program, Moroff suggested.

The department will collect public comment on the recommendations until Aug. 14, at which point Rodriguez will sort through the responses and then begin carrying out a plan. Some of the recommendations, such as improving the department’s special education Web site, will be relatively quick and easy, Harries said. More substantive changes, such as encouraging teachers to include special education students in general education classes, will take longer to put in place.

Moroff warned that other reports about special education have been released without ever appreciably changing the system. “It doesn’t necessarily go anywhere,” she said about Harries’s report. “If it’s taken to the next level, then he did a really good job.”

Here are the complete recommendations Harries delivered to the chancellor today:


  • http://www.sinksalive.blogspot.com KitchenSink

    No mention of charter schools as a source for dissemination. Yet some are doing very interesting things – and contrary to popular belief, seeking out and serving well students with disabilities.

    For that matter, any schools that have strong special education programs. I wonder if he could highlight some of the schools where saw best practices and the reasons why; we could all benefit from holding those schools up as examples.

  • Ellen McHugh

    I am confused. On the one hand a dept. spokesman is quoted in the following way “A department spokesman, David Cantor, said that the department is also planning to replace Wernikoff, rather than letting Rokeach or others absorb her responsibilities.”
    The piece published in InsideSchools this evening leads me to believe differently as it seems to indicate that, “Rodriguez and Rokeach will review feedback on Harries’ report, and then decide which recommendations to put into action.”

    Where do the two individuals from ELL and Spec. Ed fit in this structure? Are they to offer informed comments or to implement only?

    And I appreciate the Chancellor’s honesty “Rodriguez will be one of only seven people reporting directly to the chancellor, making the needs of nearly 250,000 disabled students and ELLs “visible and transparent at the cabinet level” for the first time, Klein said.”

    Parents of these two groups of students have long clamored to have the needs of their students recognized at the cabinet level. The only disappointment is that is took seven long years for the voices to be heard.

  • http://edintheapple peter

    There are many hundreds, perhaps many thousands of kids who are intentionally being deprived of IEP mandated services … partially because some principals can’t figure it out, and in some instances it simply saves dollars … it has become commonplace to change IEPs to fit the school model rather than the needs of the kid … yes, special education services need a careful review … this Report doesn’t do it …

  • Helena Lewis

    It seems as if most reform proposals in Special Education are geared towards lower school children. I welcome the possibility of support for High School students who are given the task of meeting the requirements for a regents diploma but are not given instructions to address their weak skills. It seems as if they must adjust to the design of a non-learning disabled environment instead of fulfilling the goals stipulated on their Individual Educational Plan. All students can achieve when given the necessary support. Students with IEP who graduate with local diplomas and IEP diplomas meet with college advisors who are not aware of the opportunities for students with special needs. Unfortunately, these students are misinformed about post-high school options. I am hopeful these concerns will be taken into consideration as Ms. Rodriquez assumes her new position. Thank you.
    Ms. Lewis

  • canwetalk

    Peter is correct about Principals not knowing what are the correct or best services for the special needs students. Many teachers are aware that IEPs are being changed to fit the needs of the school instead of the students. I have heard of untenured SpEd teachers directed to change IEPs so that self-contained students are programmed to have CTT classes. Unfortunately, these students lose out because they can not keep pace with the demands of the class and students who are on target feel resentful that the CTT teachers have to slow down the lesson because of these students whose conceptual acquisition level is many grades below the other students. IDEA was a law created to protect these types of students and to ensure that they needs are met. Yet, Principals are cutting corners, not only because they save money, but short-changing these students so that they stats will look as though every child is in a main stream class and just a few are special needs. The stats! It all boils down to the stats! They are too many administrators in this system without any teaching experience designing and planning programs that are too complex for even the most experienced teacher. The DoE’s cadre of quasi-educators made so many changes to special education programs/services that the victim, once again, will be these children. Shame on them.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Recently Posted Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Our Twitter Updates

  • Several readers have asked us to change our site so that external links open in a new browser tab. Anyone disagree? Anyone agree? 12 hrs ago
  • 12 NYC schools on @Newsweek's list of best 1,000 American high schools (not the same as last week's list): http://t.co/1tqx9o2C 13 hrs ago
  • Dennis Walcott runs, sings in a church choir, and makes the week's meals on Sundays: "I can do everything except sew." http://t.co/vVOBRp5G 16 hrs ago
  • @JBrownDPost: surprised to see that federal gov. doesn't have a way of deciding "what worked" for the SIG schools over 3 yrs process. #EWA12 1 day ago
  • .@tkonz: Of 18 SIG schools, only about 4 teachers were recruited from strong schools because they "wanted to be part of a big change" #EWA12 1 day ago
  • More updates...

Archives

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031