Post a comment about the budget cuts at your school on our interactive comment map. more »
There’s nowhere to put this, so here’s as good as anywhere. Who else got the “Mike Bloomberg’s Public School Progress Report” from “Bloomberg for Mayor 2009?”
Who else had trouble with the math?
To whit: The glossy mailer (with the United Colors of Beneton kids on the cover) claims that Math scores are “up 42 percentage points,” Reading Scores are “up 28 percentage points,” for scores “on 8th grade tests.” No references.
A little googling later… the NYSED website has powerpoints covering four years 2006-2009 (granted not the Mayor’s full seven years, spring 2003 - 2009) with the following:
Math test scores up from 640 to 668. Looks like +4.4% to me.
ELA test scores up from 639 to 653. Looks like +2.2% to me.
Heck, I’ll even “double down” and guess +8.8% and +4.4% for Math and ELA respectively for 7 years instead of 4.
So what the heck is going on here? Hey campaign hacks! Got Accountability? Got ACCOUNTING? What WERE they COUNTING?
Could it be that the MikeBloombergNYC hacks are off by something on the order of a factor of 477% on Math (”42%” / 8.8%) and 636% on ELA (”28%” / 4.4%)?
Ken? Aaron? Eduwonkette?
Ref: GS from June 1:
http (colon) //gothamschools (dot) org/2009/06/01/new-state-math-scores-reflect-measured-gains-officials-say/
Also: http (colon) //www (dot) emsc (dot) nysed (dot) gov/irts/ela-math/ , and slides 41 and 40 respectively of the Math and ELA ppt’s.
Its not often that I’m tempted to complain about your judgments, but you got the effect of “the firefighter test case” backwards. I couldn’t believe that Petrilli believes that the case “clears the way” for teacher testing.
Actually the thrust of his post was the opposite that you implied.
I got cut off. Petrilli was focusing on a minor aspect of “reform” standardizing testing of teachers, but e correctly asserted that the incentive will be to shift to more “performance testing.” Thatapplies equally to the more important issue of using test data for evaluation, tenure, and assigning teachers.f
As I was trying to write, no longer will districts be able to just assert that their policies advance interests. They will need to show substantive evidence before taking away the rights of teachers. I sure don’t support the Roberts Court, but this will focus the minds of “reformers.” “Reformers” like at the Ed Trust, who don’t see anything wrong with moving teachers around like chess pieces to advance their theories about equity, just got their kness taken out.
Should I now press post, or just wait until this comment publishes itself like the last two prematurely posted comments? I don’t understand the gremlins in my computer.
I can’t believe I commented on some silly Supreme Court rulings before I read about the outrage against global community schooling in L.A.
Mr. Cortines, tear down this wall in your mind!
Bruno, we love you!
5 Comments
Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack