GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

tailspin

State’s plan to move ELA and math tests to May upsets schools

Beginning next year, state math and reading tests will be given in May, rather than two months apart in January and March, the state decided earlier this week. But beyond the barest outline of the schedule, details about the change are still unclear.

Details up in the air include when exactly the tests will be given and how results will be tabulated in time for the start of the next school year. “Work is now underway to revise current examination calendars and scoring timelines,” State Education Department deputy commissioner Johanna Duncan-Poitier said in materials released this week.

The schedule change is throwing schools’ plans for next year into question just as teachers are leaving for the summer. Steven Evangelista, the principal of Harlem Link Charter School, said his teachers have already planned their lessons for all of next year, and finding out that the state tests are moving is forcing them to revise the plans.

“At this late date, when we have already mapped out our entire curriculum and assessment calendar for 2009-10, changing the date of high-stakes tests throws a monkey wrench in our plans,” Evangelista said, adding that he wondered whether getting results over the summer would give teachers enough time to use the data to inform their instruction. He said he hadn’t heard about the Regents’ debate before this week.

In the past, some schools have focused more heavily on reading before the state test in January, then shifted their focus to math in the months before the March math test. Some schools also plan different kinds of lessons for after the state tests, when the pressure to prepare students for the exams has lifted.

Even schools that shun explicit test prep, including Evangelista’s, say the schedule change could pose problems for them.

The calendar change represents rapid-fire action for the Board of Regents, the body that sets school policy in the state. The Regents surveyed teachers, parents, and administrators about the testing schedule in February, weighed the results in March, and made its decision in June. Originally, the Regents indicated that the change would not go into effect until the 2010-2011 school year, but the decision made this week is moving tests that are less than a year away.

The city’s education department supported changing the test schedule, Chief Accountability Officer James Liebman said at a meeting of the city school board on Tuesday, where Schools Chancellor Joel Klein announced the Regents’ decision. But Liebman said the city had urged the state to space the two exams out.

That position was similar to the one taken by most of the people who responded to the Regents’ survey earlier this spring. More than 80 percent of those surveyed said the tests should be moved later in the year, but 70 percent of them thought the tests should be separated by one or more months.

Another concern is a new federal requirement that asks officials to speed up the process of evaluating schools’ accountability status. But Duncan-Poitier said this week that an advantage of the May test date is that the state will be able to meet that requirement.

The change in testing could also affect the city’s school evaluation system. Progress report cards for schools are based largely on the proportion of students who show a year’s worth of progress in one year on state tests. If the tests are given more than a year apart next year, the city will likely recalibrate some of its calculations, although the underlying formula used to devise the city’s progress reports will not change, said a Department of Education spokesman, Andrew Jacob.

  • Michael M.

    Tweed is already licking its accountability chops over the impact the later-in-the-year tests will have on their bragging points. Why bother “recalibrating” when last year, DOE simply gave out 20% more A’s than the prior year?

    At the risk of over-reading, note that the last para above emphasized the “progress” metric, but the delay will impact the “performance” metric as well. Who’s to say how much learning happens at what time of the school year? Ah-HAH! MORE testing!

    Gawd ferbid we leave teachers time to teach anything not on a standardized test.

  • TShannon

    Are they just referring to the elementary schools and JHS? This would never work in HS!

  • http://www.bronxteach.com Ruben Brosbe

    This complaint makes no sense to me. Assuming the test is valid, it makes more sense to administer it so it tests cumulative knowledge, not at some arbitrary date (right after vacations, no less). By complaining that his teachers have already planned their lessons for the year and now will have to redo their curriculum, Evangelista is implicitly admitting that his school teaches to the test.

  • http://missmalarkey.blogspot.com miss malarkey

    My opinions:
    Ultimately, this will be better for the kids. I feel like we create this pressure cooker till January, then they take the test and think the year’s over. Getting them to do anything and show up for extended day was really hard. Now we don’t have to be so tense. At least, this is the atmosphere in my school. I also wrote the curriculum for grade 6 ELA. My driving focus was thinking about what would make the kids the best readers and writers, not what was going to help them pass a test. To me, they are one and the same. But this also raises another point- that I don’t think the kids need to be tested in writing every year. Less or no writing for certain grades would definitely expedite the evaluation process. Truthfully, I get more info about how my kids write from their day-to-day work, not the state exam results.

  • http://mildlymelancholy.blogspot.com MildlyMelancholy

    I for one am THRILLED about this decision. I have been railing against the illogic (erm, is that a word?) of January ELA exams for five years now. The math test in March wasn’t as bad; they still had a good 3/4 of the year before the test. But giving a Big Test after *four* months of school?? and right after a long break???
    Halle-freaking-lujah is what I say to this news–the best decision the DOE has made in years!

  • http://charterschoolindependent.blogspot.com mathteacher

    In Massachusetts, the ELA test happens at the end of March/beginning of April. Then, the kids have a break before the Math and Science tests in mid to late June. All the tests (save Composition, which is given on the same day around the state), can be given on consecutive days during a window of 2-3 weeks, which give school flexibility to give the test when it best suits them. We’ve always gotten preliminary school level data back in August, with state-wide results back in the fall. New changes next year will get the preliminary results back in June, which is even better.

  • Dissenter

    I am very happy about this. I hated that my son had to face a reading/writing test just days after winter break ended. That wasn’t fair to him or to other students.

  • Ellen McHugh

    Not for nothing, as we say in Brooklyn, children took these exams in May for years…..years! The issue wasn’t the date of the exams but how long it took to mark them and return the results to the schools and parents.

  • Sheila

    I’m always curious about how administrators make decisions for our children’s best interests. I live in Los Angeles. Testing for our state occurs in May. This is a difficult time of year for high schoolers, in particular, who deal with AP tests at this time as well as making decisions about colleges, and in many cases, high school students are taking college courses that have finals in May. In southern California, many districts are pushing up school start dates to mid-August in attempt to get more instruction time in prior to state testing in all subject areas. Poor kids are losing their summers now, too. I think we all know testing is definitely not about improving student instruction, but is about improving district and school funding via higher test scores. That said, if districts honestly want to get the most money, they ought to move the testing to June. There is absolutely no instruction that is derived from the tests we administer. The best thing we can do for our children is have the tests in June and allow them a summer break, and an opportunity for high schoolers to better space their tests.

  • http://www.powerlearning21.com/ Teach Online

    There should be no problem with regards to the exam date as this process is expected and was implemented ever since. The time it takes to assess the results is intriguing. 

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031