GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

decision 2009

A pitch to expand the city’s parents’ bill of rights (which exists)

While lawmakers in Albany battle over how much to limit the mayor’s control of the public schools, a City Council member from Brooklyn is zeroing in on another part of the city school system he wants revised: the parents’ “bill of rights” — which apparently exists! Bill De Blasio, who is running for public advocate this year, is using the bill of rights to illustrate his argument for a “bottom-up” rather than “top-down” approach to improving public schools.

The current version of the list, created by the Department of Education and published on the department’s Web site, includes five rights that parents have (the right to file a complaint, the right to “be actively involved”) plus seven responsibilities (they must send their children to school “ready to learn,” they must keep track of their children’s performance, they must treat educators with respect).

The version drafted this week by Bill de Blasio, a City Council member from Brooklyn, outlines 10 rights that would give parents much wider latitude to participate in policy-making (plus the crowd-pleaser right to a “reasonable approach to cellular phones.”)

De Blasio has been telling supporters that he would improve the city schools by using the public advocate’s office as a kind of organizing arm of government that would empower parents to get more involved in improving their schools — and to supply them with the information required to do that.

De Blasio explained his position at a recent fundraiser in Harlem tied to education issues that I attended, where supporters brought toys to donate along with cash for the campaign and De Blasio’s two children, both public school students, made an appearance.

Here’s the full bill of rights, below the jump:

De Blasio’s Parents’ Bill of Rights

New York City Public School Parents are partners in education. Given the opportunity, they can be important allies to educators, and provide critical support to schools and students. It is in the interest of our public school system to include parents in conversations about education and important decisions that will affect families. We should treat parents, teachers, administrators and DOE representatives alike with the same mutual respect, and we should provide parents with the right resources and tools to perform their role effectively.

All New York City Public School Parents deserve a right to:

1) Free, quality zoned schools, regardless of race, income level, primary language, or neighborhood, that set students on a path to being college ready and career prepared.

2) Schools that grow with the community, respond to changing local needs, and have sufficient capacity for neighborhood students and their siblings.

3) A safe and respectful environment for children while they are in school, and while in transit to and from school.

4) Direct communication with children in times of distress or emergency, including a reasonable approach to cellular phones that addresses the concerns of parents and children.

5) Timely and accurate information about opportunities available to students, and any policy and programmatic changes that may affect families – parents should be the first to know, not the last.

6) Participate with other parents and community members in an effective body that has a defined role and provides meaningful input into school policies and programs before decisions are made, particularly decisions affecting their children, local schools and school siting.

7) Access to comprehensive and thoughtful information about the performance of children’s schools, as well as the ability to regularly provide evaluations of both schools and central administration.

8) Real and independent transparency, including access to academic data and budget information that, at a minimum, breaks down spending on classrooms, individual DOE initiatives and programs, and central operations.

9) An accessible, independent and enforceable grievance procedure.

10) Open lines of honest, respectful, two-way communication with local school representatives and Department of Education officials who have the capacity to solve problems within the DOE, as well as access to translation and interpretation services to enable all parents to communicate effectively.

  • ceolaf

    Bill,

    It looks to me like #’s 1-3 are as much children’s right’s as parents’ — probably much more so, actually.

    At what point do children’s right become parents’ rights? Have you considered “families’ rights”? Or, do you consider what society owes to children to really be owed to their parents?

    If so, what would that say about the purpose and nature of schooling? Is it to satisfy parents, or is it something for children — in addition to possibly being something for society?

  • http://nycpublicschoolparents.blogspot.com Patrick J. Sullivan

    These are, of course, all laudable things to desire but offering them now when the governance structure is being debated is a distraction from the important questions of how budgetary and policy authority should be reformed. Why? Because the mayor and chancellor would embrace every one of these “rights”, promise to do better and absolutely nothing would change. In Manhattan parents from District 2 and District 3 have had to launch two lawsuits to protect even the rights we have under current law. Wishful thinking is not going to help our kids. Those who seek to represent parents in citywide offices need to outline hard-nosed solutions to the problems we face.

  • Pingback: Public School Parents’ Bill of Rights « OntheWilderSide

  • Michael M.

    Goals shmoals.
    Parents need ROLES.

    Choice shmoice.
    Parents need a VOICE.

    Typical of DOE to give parents more responsibilities than rights, and power? Gawd ferbid.
    Patrick is spot on.

  • ceolaf

    The problem with any bill of rights is that is some time to operationalize those rights into policies. It’s one thing to agree that some group has some right, it’s another to agree on how it would actually work on the ground.

    Obviously, the model for any such list is the Bill of Rights amended to our federal constitution. But it took decades for the interpretation to be worked worked out, and at least one additional constitutional amendment to give it today’s meanings (i.e. that they apply to the states, in addition to the federal government).

    Unfortunately, those who put forth one bill of rights or another do not have the patience to work through that process. Instead, “X bill of rights” has replaced “war on” in our public policy discussions, with about as much real chance of advancement. Nice catchy titles that are hard to argue with and are meant for public — and media — consumption, but little thought into practicalities and complications. And so they become aspirational, rather determinative. Hopes, rather than law. And they cheapen the idea of “rights,” redefining the term downward.

    I know that Elizabeth did the right thing in passing this on, but it’s just PR and a stunt on DeBlasio’s part.

  • http://www.davidcbloomfield.wordpress.com David C. Bloomfield

    The DOE’s “Bill of Rights” is required by the New York State Education Law section 2590-h(15)(c), which charges the Chancellor with “developing, in consultation with associations of parents in the
    city district, and implementing no later than October first, nineteen
    hundred ninety-eight, a parental bill of rights which provides for, at minimum:
    (i) reasonable access by parents, persons in parental relation and
    guardians to schools, classrooms, and academic and attendance records of
    their own children, consistent with federal and state laws, provided
    that such access does not disrupt or interfere with the regular school
    process; (ii) the rights of parents, persons in parental relation and guardians to take legal action and appeal the decisions of the school
    administration, as authorized by law; (iii) the right of parents, persons in parental relation and guardians
    to have information on their own child’s educational materials; (iv) access to and information about all public meetings, hearings of the chancellor, the city board, the community superintendents, the
    community boards, and the schools; and (v) access to information regarding programs that allow students to apply for admission where appropriate to schools outside a student’s own attendance zone.”

  • Pingback: A week after criticism, city expands its parents bill of rights - Online Education in America

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Feb. 10: You’re invited!

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Our Twitter Updates

  • Despite some tense confrontations between protesters and police, nothing ever got physical and a lieutenant just said there were no arrests. 4 hrs ago
  • He's been frozen in that stoic position all night MT @lisafleisher: A protester speaks with his middle finger. http://t.co/xLar4NRU 5 hrs ago
  • Last of the occupy protesters just walked out together, shouting expletives and insults on their way out. #toughcrowd 5 hrs ago
  • Frank Thomas, DOE spokesman just told me no arrests have been made tonight at PEP despite confrontation between protesters & police earlier. 5 hrs ago
  • RT @leoniehaimson: It's been shown repeatedly that as one schl closes another overwhelmed w/ high needs kids that small schls won't take 5 hrs ago
  • More updates...

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  
?>