GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

a wider net

More students qualify for gifted programs; DOE credits outreach

A chart produced by the Department of Education that shows

A chart produced by the Department of Education that shows the number of children qualifying for gifted programs in each district, compared to last year.

Nearly 50 percent more incoming kindergartners scored high enough on two nationally normed assessments to be eligible for a seat in a gifted and talented program, according to data released today by the Department of Education. The percentage of test-takers who qualified also increased, from 18 to 22 percent.

The jump in participation shows that the standardized procedures the DOE established last year for admission to gifted programs are gaining traction, DOE spokesman Andrew Jacob told me today. ”It reflects that families are more familiar with the way we’re running the admissions process,” he said.

The increased number of students eligible for gifted programs could be seen as a feather in the cap for the DOE, which has said it wants to expand access to gifted programs to children citywide, particularly in communities that have not had robust gifted programs in the past. Jacob told me the department this year ramped up its outreach to prekindergarten programs in districts where too few children took the tests and scored high enough last year to warrant opening programs.

“We wanted to find as many children as possible in the city who could meet the standard that we set,” he said.

In terms of sheer numbers, some of the biggest gains happened in districts that already enroll many children in gifted programs, including the districts comprising Staten Island and most of Manhattan below 96th Street.

Children are eligible to join a gifted program if they score in the 90th percentile or higher on two nationally normed assessments; children who score in the 97th percentile or higher can also apply to ultra-elite citywide programs.

The DOE has said it will add as many as 175 seats in citywide programs, bringing the total number to 435; a total of 1,345 incoming kindergartners scored high enough to jockey for coveted spots, ensuring that many families who apply to citywide programs will not be placed in them. The total number of students qualifying for gifted admission is 3,231. All of the children, including those who qualify for the more selective programs, are guaranteed a spot in a district program if they want one.

Families will receive their children’s scores this week. The next step is for families of eligible children to submit an application ranking the programs in their district and, if applicable, elsewhere in the city. The DOE will match families with programs based on their preferences and demand for each program and will let families know where they’ve been accepted by mid-June.

The department has said it expects applications to gifted programs to siphon away some of the enrollment crunch that has left families on the waiting list for their zoned school at more than 100 schools around the city. It will not be until the end of the school year, when families are required to accept or decline the gifted program they’ve been placed into, that waitlists at overenrolled schools should start moving, Jacob told me today.

The admissions process is substantially the same as last year, when it debuted to some rocky results, including a drop in the number of children in poor districts gaining admission to gifted programs. But there are some some changes, Jacob told me. First, he said that while the department hasn’t yet set a minimum number of students for a gifted class, the number will definitely be higher than the one used this year, when programs were permitted to open with as few as eight students.

Also, the DOE is trying to make it easier for families to evaluate their options. Last year, many parents reported finding it difficult to figure out which schools were holding open houses and when. This year, the DOE is maintaining a schedule of open houses for all schools that families of eligible children can rank.

Even with the increase, most families still do not participate in the gifted screening process. When the DOE first announced the standardized G&T admissions procedures last year, it said it planned to screen every child for eligibility this year. It dropped that plan last May as a result of budget cuts. Jacob told me today the decision to scrap universal screening was also a response to an outcry from some parents who said they did not want their children tested. He said the department is instead focusing on outreach to continue increasing the number of families seeking G&T screening.

From my conversations with parents, it’s clear that there is much room for improved outreach. When I was at the lottery for the Harlem Success network of charter schools two weeks ago, I asked all the parents I spoke to whether they had also had their children screened for gifted programs, in addition to applying for charter schools. Only one had, and several told me they didn’t know they had the option or found out about it only after the deadline had passed.

I spent way more time than I should have tonight looking at the numbers. Tomorrow, I’ll post a little more analysis about the data released today.

2009 Gat Results

6 Comments

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack

  1. Ellen McHugh

    “The department has said it expects applications to gifted programs to siphon away some of the enrollment crunch that has left families on the waiting list for their zoned school at more than 100 schools around the city…..All of the children, including those who qualify for the more selective programs, are guaranteed a spot in a district program if they want one.”

    There is only so much room in so many schools. If the parents choose to have their children stay in their districts, and the DOE, as promised, opens G/T programs in the districts where will the students be placed? If D 2, 3 and 31 are already overcrowded, where will the DOE find space for a District program? There are 1,345 eligible for the Citywide programs and 3,231 eligible for the local district programs for a total of 6,576 children eligible with an average of 200 students per district at Kindergarten level. How much does this number differ from the number of students accepted annually at that age level under the old system?
    I am not knocking G/T programs, I am wondering where there will be room.
    There are storm warnings ahead……

  2. Mary

    I’m also wondering why the numbers of the children who qualified for 1st, 2nd and 3rd aren’t posted yet. Will those stats be available this week?

  3. Brooklynmom

    Going over the chart detailing school tours, I noticed that some tours happened before May 4th when the G&T scores were sent out, while others take place within days (1-3) of when parents are likely to receive the news. In addition there are no TIMES for these tours. As a parent on the cusp of a long-term relationship with the DOE, I am not impressed.

  4. Last year, 40% of all students qualifying for gifted programs came from just three districts - District 2, District 3, and District 22.

    This year, the exact same percentage - 40% - of all students qualifying for gifted programs once again came from just these three districts.

    If you want to add the next three largest sending districts - Districts 15, 20, and 21 - 56% of all admissions last year went to students from just six districts. This year, 56% of admissions again went to students from these districts.

    The overall numbers of students qualifying is up, but the distribution of seats between districts has not changed in any meaningful way. Expressing the growth in number of seats in terms of percent changes in extremely misleading given that the poor districts had a tiny number of students participating to begin with.

  5. The six districts that dominate the G/T stats have long standing programs that predate Children’s First by many years. For example, Dist 22 Gifted programs go back to the early 80s. “Select” programs in designated elementary schools, a middle schol choice option with some programs requiring testing. In many of the districts with only a handful of students the outreach was meager … especially when principals have a disincentive … they lose their L 4 kids … with severe adverse impact on their school data.

  6. Michael M.

    In a blurb to the press today, DOE claims that the kids in D2 who qualify for G&T will help clear the Kindergarten wait lists for their zoned schools on the UES and in the Village. (Similar re D3, the UWS.) Rullly?

    Again, these sub-districts’ zoned schools have wait lists. Which means they have a SEAT SHORTAGE.

    So, on what basis does DOE think that parents — who have already shown an inclination to keep their kids close to home — will prefer an OUT-OF-SUB-DISTRICT G&T program, at sites still to be announced?

    Otherwise, we’re just changing the labels on some in-zone Kindergarten classrooms from “Gen Ed” to “G&T” — and haven’t substantively changed the SEAT SHORTAGE picture.

    Unless part of the G&T K-riculum is kayaking from the UES to Roosevelt Island, or migrating north every morning from GV/SOHO to see Chelsea / Clinton…

Leave a Reply

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Mapping the Budget Cuts

Post a comment about the budget cuts at your school on our interactive comment map. more »

Chalk It Up

Our Twitter Updates

  • Citywide Council on High Schools meeting is set to proceed as scheduled, for now. Same goes for the PEP meeting rescheduled from Jan. 26. 8 hrs ago
  • From the DOE: In anticipation of inclement weather, the Specialized High School open houses scheduled for Weds. have been postponed. 8 hrs ago
  • @datadiva What do you see as the biggest changes? We're having trouble figuring out what to make of the 2010-2011 changes. in reply to datadiva 9 hrs ago
  • NY is near the top RT @alexanderrusso: State by state list of National Merit cut scores shows gaps, equity problems http://bit.ly/dw1Ztv 9 hrs ago
  • RT @HillcrestHigh: The DOE states that ARIS Internet Parent Link is out of service until 2/12. 3 days ago

Events Calendar

Archives

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

GothamSchools by Email

Technology in Education

The blogroll is a work-in-progress; to be added or if you've been miscategorized, send us an email at .