GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

Saying discharges are up, report demands grad rate audit

A chart in the report.

Six years after Schools Chancellor Joel Klein vowed to crack down on a bureaucratic loophole that allowed principals to hide students’ failure to graduate high school, a new report (PDF) suggests that the loophole remains open and may be growing wider. The report calls for closer study of the students classified as “discharges” — departures from the system, but not dropouts — through steps including a state audit.

The report says that 21 percent of students who entered high school in 2003 both never graduated and were never counted as dropouts, instead falling into a category known as “discharges.” The percentage was up from 17.5 percent among the Class of 2000. The rate is especially high among special education students, and includes a remarkable jump in 2005, when the special education discharge rate shot up to 36 percent from 23 percent in a single year.

Students classified as discharges can include those who left the school system for legitimate reasons, such as moving to another state, deciding to enroll in an outside G.E.D. program, or death. But some advocates have argued that principals can also misuse the discharge code, entering students who simply dropped out in order to inflate their graduation rate artificially.

A recent audit of 12 high schools in New York State by the state comptroller, Thomas DiNapoli, found that high schools classified students as G.E.D. discharges who did not actually enroll in a G.E.D. program. “As a result,” DiNapoli’s audit concluded, “the report cards understated the number and percentage of dropouts and overstated the percentage of graduates for some of the schools we reviewed.” The audit did not probe any New York City high schools.

Two persistent critics of the Bloomberg administration compiled the report: the executive director of Class Size Matters, Leonie Haimson, and a Ph.D. candidate at Columbia University, Jennifer Jennings. Jennings was the author of the now-defunct Eduwonkette blog, whose analysis of New York City education data became (as I reported) a thorn in the Bloomberg administration’s side. The report is being released at a press conference this morning held by a third critic, the city’s public advocate, Betsy Gotbaum.

City school officials were already disputing the report’s claims yesterday, before it had been released. About 90 percent of high school discharges are for students who are enrolling at a private school or moving out of the city, DOE spokesman Andrew Jacob said. The financial firm Ernst & Young includes in its annual audit of the city’s graduation numbers an examination of whether schools properly documented that students enrolled where they said they would, Jacob added. And he said that the slightly higher number of discharges in 2007 represents a fluctuation, not a trend, with the DOE’s internal numbers indicating that the number of discharges dropped in 2008.

In an interview last night that was embargoed until the formal release of the report today, Jennings, the report’s lead author, said that the report is part of her dissertation, which looks at the effects of accountability policies. She said that the report should not be seen as a critique of the Bloomberg administration. Rather, she theorized that the federal No Child Left Behind law might have given principals an incentive to use the “discharge” code to inflate their graduation rates artificially.

One highlighted point in the report is a sharp rise in the percentage of first-year high school students who are discharged. Jennings speculated that the rise could be a result of a policy in NCLB that exempts principals from being held accountable for students who have not been at a school for more than five months.

She said the report’s main purpose is to call attention to students who may be being overlooked — and to urge policymakers to study who they are and why they are leaving. “It’s a problem that hasn’t been solved,” Jennings said. “But for the benefit of the 20,000 or some kids who are discharged every year, it’d be great to know.”

There’s tons more information in this report; we’ll pull out other interesting parts as we find them.

  • http://richamango@aol.com rick mangone

    Liz-It could be that the 9th graders are actually students age 15 and older who are still 9th graders in term of credit accumulation, but, in fact are older students who have just dropped out.

  • Michael M.

    Re “Rather, she theorized that the federal No Child Left Behind law might have given principals an incentive to use the “discharge” code to inflate their graduation rates artificially.”

    How much of the administration’s boast that graduation rates have gone up 20% can be accounted for by the above?

    Are not those 21% — TWENTY-ONE PERCENT — getting “Left Behind?”

    How about more kids successfully hitting the books, and less DOE **COOKING** the books?

  • Michael M.

    Fun with math:
    Say graduation rates go up from 50% to 60%.

    Is that a 10% increase (as most people would read it), or a 20% increase (as I’m guessing the DOE spin machine would have it)?

  • Jane

    I wish the actual report was available online. Hope it is soon.

  • Aaron Pallas
  • eduwonkette

    Hi Jane, The report is available here: http://www.pubadvocate.nyc.gov/new_news/documents/DischargesRevisited.pdf. Feel free to email me if you have trouble downloading it. (jlj2102 (at) columbia (dot) edu) Jennifer

  • crusader

    This just sounds like a case of torturing the figures until they confess. If a 9th grader leaves NYC for another school district or enrolls in private/parochial school why should it be the school system’s duty to verify where they went? I don’t want any money wasted on finding out where these kids went — they left the system, it was their parent’s decision to do that. No doubt there are lots of kids who get to 9th grade and after a career of being passed along through social promotion, they fail miserably when having to actually accumulate credits to graduate high school. Life’s full of tests. High school is one of them. Still, the idea that all of the discharges were somehow thrown out of the high schools and that this is the evil genius idea of the school system to boost their grad rates, well the people squiring this idea around must have missed their dose of Prozac today. And Betsy Gotbaum always seems to have missed her dose of Prozac each time I see her shrilling away on TV.

  • sodeskune

    All I know is at my school the 9th grade is way bigger than the 11th and 12th grades. I would say half of the students have gone elsewhere by 11th or 12th grade. Class sizes are huge in 9th grade, about 30 students, but in 11th and 12th grade there are 12 or 13 kids, maybe at the most 15. Our school boasts a 90 percent graduation rate. I guess that is 90 percent of the 50 percent who make it to 12th grade. I suppose Crusader thinks they have all gone to charter schools where there are no lazy unionized teachers. I think if anyone has missed their dose of prozac it is people who defend the mayor and his current education policies.

  • Sarah Reckhow

    I understand that the report points to NCLB accountability policies rather than reforms under Bloomberg/Klein as a possible cause of the higher discharge rates. But I wonder if there is some relationship between the higher discharge rates and the policy to restructure large comprehensive high schools into small schools. I’m not sure of the mechanism, but it’s troubling that the high schools being phased out have notably higher rates. Perhaps the disruption produced by this policy pushes out more students in schools being restructured? Is there a noticeable difference between discharge rates in remaining large comprehensive high schools and the restructured high schools with small schools?

  • crusader

    I want to be clear that I’m not defending the Mayor or his education policies, sodeskune, but I also want to put a spotlight on that impulse that I read around here that somehow schools were in a golden age before Mayoral control. It is probably things like accountability that are even forcing the school system to keep track of discharges. I’m sure under the old Board of Education they couldn’t even tell you how many discharges there had been from 9th grade. I remember those stories of kids not showing up to school for a whole year and the old district offices and schools didn’t even notice. What’s true is that with the old Board of Education, schools were the Titanic. I think present day, they are more of an Achille Lauro. I’ll gladly take the former over the latter.

  • http://www.classsizematters.org leonie haimson

    The discharge data goes back many years long before Joel Klein came into office. . Since 2002, when the AFC report came out documenting the problem, and Klein called the problem a “tragedy”, this administration has nothing to address it — and in fact, in many respects the problem has gotten worse, with a doubling of the rate of students discharged in their first year of high school.

    The report also points out several aspects of DOE accountability policies that may be contributing to this trend — including the fact that High schools can discharge students at no cost to their accountability status, an emphasis on 9th grade credit accumulation, and multiple grade retentions, that may be leading to entering HS students to be more overage than before.

  • http://www.classsizematters.org leonie haimson

    Also, forgot to mention: the state comptroller said that on the basis of our report, and Gotbaum’s request, he will audit NYC’s graduation and discharge rate.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

19 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031