GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

1. 

   gsh

   December 19th, 2008 5:51 pm

   Staying late to continue a meeting she delayed is of little consolation to someone that has other meetings to get to. As someone that shows up 5 minutes early for every meeting and often has places to be at specific times across town, I would find this very disrespectful. I do not like my time wasted.

   As my parents would say, if you show up to a late, you better be out of breath. Perhaps she should cut back on one of her jobs, or work harder and manage expectations of herself for the two she has now.

   This post reeks of pro-Weingarten bias and it’s apologist sentiment is the same fallacy that is ruining our schools. Is it okay for Weingarten to habitually late to meetings because she’s working as president for two union? No, it is not okay to relax standards for someone because they are working for something ‘good’ or ‘right’.

2. 

   Mr. Benjamin

   December 19th, 2008 6:19 pm

   Ms. Weingarten’s lack of punctuality is legendary. Ms. Kennedy should consider herself quite fortunate for her brief wait. Many of us have waited for her appearance at meetings for hours.

3. 

   miss malarkey

   December 19th, 2008 8:54 pm

   A “tireless work ethic” should include being on time for meetings. Tardiness is unprofessional. Doesn’t she have “people” to handle scheduling?

4. 

   NYC Educator

   December 19th, 2008 9:08 pm

   It also find it curious that a “tireless work ethic” would include chronic tardiness. That’s a quality not much appreciated in teachers, and for good reason.

5. 

   Smith

   December 20th, 2008 1:07 am

   C’mon, NYC Educator. It’s a big deal that she’s done nothing to make the job easier for new teachers and that we’re the only union in the city that has trouble retaining members. It’s not a big deal that she’s late for meetings.

6. 

   NYC Educator

   December 20th, 2008 5:03 am

   I certainly can’t argue the importance of the issues you mention. Perhaps it’s just emblematic of something else.

   My job entails reporting to a decrepit trailer well past its expiration date while it’s still dark outside, and making cold, tired, hungry kids do the same. It’s a little tough for me to sympathize with Ms. Weingarten’s chronic inability to report on time for the gala luncheons we appear to be paying her to attend, and I’m afraid I remain unimpressed with her failure to meet standards I regularly impose on14-year-olds.

7. 

   Pogue

   December 20th, 2008 8:14 am

   Look, give her a break, will ya’? When backroom deals are constantly being made, it takes a little while longer to get to your next destination.

8. 

   reformnow

   December 20th, 2008 5:57 pm

   Hey, cut her a little slack. Protecting mediocre educators both locally and nationally from those with other (pro-children) priorities is more than a full-time gig.

9. 

   Pogue

   December 20th, 2008 10:01 pm

   Yeah, we need reform now, because teachers have done a lot more damage to this country than the greedily mediocre CEO’s, Wall Streeters, and SEC both locally and nationally who have ruined this nation’s economy.

10. 

    William M. Fox

    May 14th, 2010 10:52 am

    Placing almost exclusive emphasis upon test-score improvement as a basis for rewarding teachers is patently unfair and, when coupled with inadequate performance-appraisal systems, drives teachers toward unethical behavior or departure to other pursuits.

    A primary reason the public has not been more supportive of higher funding for education has been the poor relationship between better funding and higher educational quality as revealed by a number of studies.

    Use of an appraisal system based upon the following guidelines should go a long way toward turning things around.

    Those associated with schools, need to fairly identify true “stars” and “inadequate performers” as one of the bases for:

    justifying good pay for outstanding teachers,

    providing for self-guidance on the part of newcomers and present staff,

    and providing an important basis for terminating those who cannot, or will not, measure up.

    Research findings show that performance raters achieve much better agreement about who are Stars and Inadequate Performers than they do about who are Average, Above-Average, and Below-Average performers. Yet, placing individuals in the middle-three categories is a time-consuming, often arbitrary, and resentment-causing activity that most raters dislike having to do. Also, clearly, an average performer in a superior organization deserves much more recognition than an average performer in an inferior one. No wonder that many teachers and their unions oppose conventional merit-rating systems!

    To avoid a popularity contest, assure greater fairness, and provide for constructive self-guidance, there should be behavioral documentation for both Star and Inadequate Performer nominations via the Critical Incident Technique.
    To lay the groundwork for this, students, parents, veteran administrators, and experienced teachers should be polled at to what specific, observable behaviors they associate with outstanding and inadequate performance for each important aspect of a teacher’s job.

    Then, required behavioral documentation for Star and Inadequate-Performer nominations from fellow teachers, adminstrators, students, and parents should be based upon the most agreed-upon behaviors, and the agreed-to relative weights that should be assigned to these.

    The results of this analysis can also constructively guide the initial training and subsequent selection of teachers, as well as, provide a much-needed, qualifying context for the currently over-stressed evaluation factor of test-score-improvement.

    This approach also sets the stage for more productive review sessions between the rater and ratee. Since the ratee has a sound basis for self-rating, the session should start with the rater asking “How do you rate yourself for this past period through the presentation of relevant, supporting behaviors?” No rater can be all-knowing, so if behaviors are mentioned that she or he is not aware of, the rater can postpone giving his or her evaluation to provide time to check out the validity of the assertions, if this seems necessary.

    A sound behavioral basis for rating also facilitates the use of motivational goal setting during the review session. For example, if the ratee wants to be a Star, what specific behavioral goals does she or he plan to adopt by such and such a time? If stardom is not the goal, which specific, Inadequate Performer behaviors will he or she need to avoid?

    This approach permits a rater to be more of a counselor and coach, than one who appears to sit in arbitrary judgment.

    For discussion of relevant research and related citations, see: “Improving Performance Appraisal Systems” by William M. Fox, NATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY REVIEW, Winter 1987-88, pages 20-27.

    William Fox
    gryfox@gru.net
    Professor Emeritus
    Department of Management
    University of Florida
    5200 SW 25th Blvd., #2210
    Gainesville, FL 32608
    (352) 376-9786

Leave a Reply