GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

Live-blogging the City Council capital plan hearing, sort of

I spent the afternoon at the City Council’s hearing on the School Construction Authority’s proposed capital plan, and I tried to post updates as they happened. Unfortunately, the wireless at City Hall wasn’t cooperating, so here are some highlights of the hearing, just a few hours after it ended.

1:20 p.m. Education Committee chair Robert Jackson led off right away with the elephant in the room: the economy. He said the city is facing “very difficult economic times” and noted that the mayor has requested that all city agencies reduce their capital requests by 20 percent. Economic conditions didn’t stop Jackson from saying that the council wants to “take [the SCA] to task for unresolved problems and exaggerated claims.” In particular, he pointed to the authority’s claim that the current capital plan is the largest in the city’s history, noting that many more seats were created in the early years of the 20th century. Jackson also noted the Campaign for a Better Capital Plan’s finding that more school seats were added in the last six years of the Giuliani administration than in the first six year’s of Bloomberg’s.

1:30 p.m. Kathleen Grimm, the DOE’s deputy chancellor for administration, drew some laughter when she read from her prepared testimony about the DOE’s recent “capital accomplishments” the departments’s oft-repeated claim that the current capital plan, which runs through the end of June 2009, is the largest in its history. She said in the future she’ll be specifying that it’s the largest plan in SCA’s history, not the DOE’s. The state created SCA in 1988.

1:45 p.m. SCA head Sharon Greenberger walked council members through a Power Point presentation about the proposed capital plan. She noted that the SCA did incorporate a plan for class size reduction into its calculations — but the reduction was to 28 students in grades 4-8 and 30 in high school, not 23 as the state Contracts for Excellence requires for those grades.

1:55 p.m. The economy rears its ugly head again. Jamie Smarr, head of the DOE’s Education Construction Fund, said he’s not focusing right now on developing new public-private partnerships to create more school seats. “My principal job is to keep the projects that we do have going through [the economic] contraction,” he said. Those projects, all of which are located in Manhattan’s District 2, include the PS 59/High School for Art and Design building whose plans were released in October.

2:10 p.m. Picking up on what’s clearly becoming a theme, Jackson and Grimm argued about the class size targets used in developing the capital plan. Jackson asked when the DOE and SCA will adopt the class size targets required by the state. Grimm’s answer: Never. “When we look at our targets and factor in the actual utilization of these classrooms … we really do arrive on a citywide level at targets that are 20 or 21,” she said. In other words, Grimm said, classes can get down to the size the state requires even if the city doesn’t build more school seats than it already plans to. Jackson didn’t buy Grimm’s logic. “Those numbers are not acceptable to me as the chair, to advocates, or to parents,” he said. “What they really mean is that children will be in overcrowded classrooms.”

2:20 p.m. Has anyone ever made a joke about Kathleen Grimm’s name? She certainly lived up to it just now when she responded to a question about school construction costs. “It is a very expensive proposition,” Grimm answered. “That’s why we are trying to use every tool we have to address overcrowding in our schools, so we don’t have to rely on capital dollars. We don’t have enough.”

2:25 p.m. Jackson has turned the floor over to his colleagues on the council. Most of them are asking about overcrowding issues in their own districts. Judging from their questions, if overcrowding is only a local problem, as the DOE says it is, it seems to affect a lot of localities.

2:40 p.m. It’s return of the light bulbs here in the Council Chambers! Last week during a hearing on the DOE’s proposed budget reductions, Council Member Lew Fidler said the city should cut costs by switching to energy-efficient light bulbs. Now Fidler said the situation is worse than just wasteful: Many schools don’t even have the fixtures to accept energy-efficient bulbs. Grimm said the current plan provided for fixture modernization but that the initiative had been cut back.

3:05 p.m. The subject has turned to Transportable Classroom Units, otherwise known as trailers. In the current capital plan, the city said it planned to removed all TCUs by 2012. But the proposed plan calls for removing trailers on an ad hoc basis only. Fidler said the change amounts to “waffling” by the DOE and SCA. But Grimm said the agencies are only responding to what principals want. “No TCU will need to be used for classroom space when the projects are completed,” she said. “But if a principal wants to keep them, and we say they’re safe, we’re not going to stop them.”

3:20 p.m. Randi Weingarten is in the house, offering testimony that she said is influenced as much by her new role as the head of the national teachers union, the American Federation of Teachers, as by her long-term experience in New York. She said the proposed capital plan “thinks small” and could hold New York City back if federal funds become available to stimulate local economies. I’ll have more on this later.

Weingarten’s testimony received a full-on round of applause in the usually staid chamber. One person who didn’t clap, but who wished he could have: Fidler, who said if it weren’t for the rules that bar council members from applauding, he would have been on his feet.

Weingarten also joined the list of people testifying that they are concerned about the SCA’s class size targets. The SCA’s planning “does seem to take aim” at the state’s class size goals, she said.

3:30 p.m.: The only actual New York City public school student in the room has taken the stand. Robert Moore, a 16-year-old student who attends the Bushwick School for Social Justice, testified on behalf of Make the Road New York, a community organization. He said his analysis showed that there aren’t enough ninth-grade seats in Bushwick to hold all of the neighborhood’s graduating eighth graders. “All students should have a choice to go to school in their community,” Moore said.

3:35 p.m. Leonie Haimson, the tireless advocate for smaller class sizes and one of the authors of the Campaign for A Better Capital report, could only address a handful of the issues outlined on her prepared testimony during her allotted time, but that was enough to for her to run through a litany of problems with the capital plan’s methodology, assumptions, and conclusions. She said the DOE and SCA are perpetrating “a huge deception” when they say overcrowding is merely a local problem, citing a survey her organization, Class Size Matters, conducted earlier this year that found that 86 percent of principals say large classes at their schools prevent them from providing a quality of education. Robert Jackson funded that survey.

Asked how much it would cost the city to reduce class sizes to the level CFE requires, Haimson said the answer — many billions of dollars — sounds “very scary.” But she said there are a number of ways to find the funds, from increasing the DOE’s share of the city’s capital spending from 13.8 to 20 percent (in keeping with its historical share) to halving the projected increase in charter school enrollment.

And about the Grimm’s explanation of why schools can still have small classes without the DOE and SCA reducing class size targets, Haimson said, “It makes no sense if you read it [in the capital plan] and it made no sense to me today.”

3:50 p.m. The tail end of this hearing reminds me of how many people have put in long hours trying to crack the problem of overcrowding. Dan Golub, the land use specialist at the Manhattan Borough President’s office, described his office’s two recent reports about how school construction isn’t keeping pace with residential construction. And he emphasized that the economic downturn shouldn’t stop new construction, as scary as it is. “We can’t plan for just the current economic situation,” he said.

4 p.m. There are a few people still hanging around to testify, but most council and audience members have left. I don’t blame them — this has been a bummer of a hearing, with testimony alternating between financial defeatism and complaints that the DOE and SCA aren’t planning to build as many schools as the city needs.

5 Comments

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack

  1. Thanks for the update - it’s great to hear the DOE being taken to task for fuzzy math. I have great sympathy for teachers and principals who have to deal with TCUs, and I thank my lucky stars that I’m at a school with decent class sizes.

  2. thanks Phillissa — Randi was on fire today and really energized the crowd. She basically said this is the time to seize the moment; to do the right thing by our kids and the economy.

    As she and Fidler pointed out, the economic downturn does not preclude building more schools, it should encourage it. Capital spending, unlike operating spending, is amortized over 30 years with the annual payments much less; moreover, because school construction is reimbursed by 50% by the state, this is a perfect opportunity to guarantee more state aid no matter what happens with this year’s state budget. Moreover, the federal stimulus package looks very like to include funds for school construction — funds that NYC will likely lose out on if we don’t ramp up our capital plan. As to the cost for the 166,000 seats we estimated were necessary– here is what my testimony had to say about that:

    “If the DOE re-allocated the $1 billion for unspecified new technology [in the capital plan]; $1 billion for environmental remediation (and instead, built schools on non-contaminated land); redirected half of the $305 million for “facility restructuring” (which means putting new schools in existing school buildings, which exacerbates overcrowding rather than relieves it) and canceled the $440 million that is supposed to go to expand the Brooklyn House of Detention, that would yield about $2.65 billion in capital funds.

    Given 50% state reimbursement for new school construction, this would provide an extra $5.3 billion for school construction – enough to triple the number of seats in the proposed plan to 75,000.

    By finding costs savings elsewhere – for example, cutting in half the projected increased enrollment in new charter schools over the next three years, the city could save about $180M in annual operating funds over the next three years. Shifted into the capital budget and amortized over 30 years, with 50% reimbursement from the state, this amount could finance another 91,000 seats, which together could pay for the166,000 new seats that are needed.

    Also — 166,000 new seats is not an unprecedented figure for a capital plan – either for New York City or the nation as a whole. As we point out in our report, the city built 100,000 new seats from 1902-5 and nearly half a million new seats during the 1920’s.

    More recently, the Los Angeles United School District adopted a $20 billion capital plan that will produce 160,000 new seats – in a system 60% the size of NYC’s – and the district has already created 80,000 of these seats since 2003.”

    The full testimony is posted at http://www.classsizematters.org/testimonycapitalplan120208.html

  3. Good report, Philissa. Is anyone asking city councilmembers who approved the current cap plan a dew years ago why they were willing to do so when it was always so nebulous from the start? Were they drunk when they voted for it or something?

  4. I was actually rather dissappointed that it was not seen fit to include the struggle of highbridge parents and youth to have a middle school built in the highbridge neighborhood of the bronx. the neighborhood has been asking for the school for over thirty years & our current campaign has been going on for over two years. we actually had the most people testify that day for a single school - councilmember jackson, councilmember arroyo, two parents from highbridge (one whom happens to vice president of district 9 community education council) and a director of a local nonprofit. while we now have a school included in this capital plan it by no means addresses the needs of the neighborhood, which has 5 elementary schools (combined graduation each year of over 600 students) and not a single middle school. the middle school that has been proposed to be built is only 389 seats, which for 4 grades - 5th, 6th, 7th & 8th means less than 100 seats per grade level (we need 5th grade because 2 of our elementary schools finish at 4th grade due to space constraints and currently children as young as 9 years old need to take 2-3 public buses or a combination of buses and trains to get to school). We have had public school students testify, parents testify, elected officials testify and our issue has been covered in the ny times, daily news, and on many stations. Highbridge is located in the poorest congressional district in the United States, the south bronx, and is one of the most geographically isolated neighborhoods in the city (located on a hill just north of the yankee stadium, its northern border is the cross bronx expressway, its western border is the major deegan expressway (I-87) & the harlem river, and its eastern border is a hill that has 5 step streets as the main access in and out of the neighborhood). A middle school that would meet the needs of these 5 elementary schools would be one of a mimimum of 1200 seats (just to cover students from the 2 schools that graduate at fouth grade). Highbridge United is a community collation representing over forty community groups, parent associations, and community leaders (including our community board, local cec) and every elected official representing the highbridge neighborhood. If anyone would like more information we can be reached at highbridgeunited@gmail.com or I can be called at 212 203 1171, there are films of our campaign at the youtube site under user highbridgethebronx. These are just a few of the articles that have covered highbridge campaign:

    Education Department approves new middle school in Highbridge
    BY TANYANIKA SAMUELS
    DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

    Thursday, November 6th 2008 http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/bronx/2008/11/06/2008-11-06_education_department_approves_new_middle.html

    NY Daily News “Highbridge school commute too long” by Tanyanika Samuels Tuesday December 18th, 2007

    http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/bronx/2007/12/18/2007-12-18_highbridge_school_commute_too_long-3.html

    NY Daily News “Roundabout route to class: It’s exhausting trip for children from Highbridge” by Tanyanika Samuels Tuesday November 27th, 2007

    (no longer available on website – I could fax you a copy if you would like)

    NY Times “ Highbridge: A Muddle over Middle School” by Jennifer Bleyer Sunday November 11th, 2007

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/nyregion/thecity/11scho.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

    Bronx Times “Highbridge Demands own Middle School” by Lorna Montalvo Thursday October 25th, 2007

    http://www.bxtimes.com/Archives.htm?appSession=67863437887562&RecordID=3185&PageID=3&PrevPageID=2&cpipage=1&CPIsortType=&CPIorderBy=

    Highbridge Horizon “Highbridge Residents Rally for new Middle School” by Tony Richards October 2007 Edition

    http://www.highbridgehorizon.com/news/oct07/rally.html

  5. [...] Gotham Schools, Philissa Cramer provides a running live-blog account of yesterday’s City Council hearings on the Capital Plan for the New York City public [...]

Leave a Reply

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Mapping the Budget Cuts

Post a comment about the budget cuts at your school on our interactive comment map. more »

Chalk It Up

Our Twitter Updates

  • That was anticlimactic: Chancellor Klein just announced that school is closed tomorrow. Go stock up on cocoa now! 4 hrs ago
  • What are odds that tomorrow will be a snow day in NYC schools? Mayor Bloomberg is holding a 1 p.m. presser to discuss the city's snow plan. 4 hrs ago
  • Citywide Council on High Schools meeting is set to proceed as scheduled, for now. Same goes for the PEP meeting rescheduled from Jan. 26. 23 hrs ago
  • From the DOE: In anticipation of inclement weather, the Specialized High School open houses scheduled for Weds. have been postponed. 23 hrs ago
  • @datadiva What do you see as the biggest changes? We're having trouble figuring out what to make of the 2010-2011 changes. in reply to datadiva 23 hrs ago

Events Calendar

Archives

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

GothamSchools by Email

Technology in Education

The blogroll is a work-in-progress; to be added or if you've been miscategorized, send us an email at .