GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

ed sec spec

Teach For America suggests it’s Darling-Hammond vs. Klein

In case you were not fully convinced, it appears that, yes, Teach For America is flexing its muscle to influence Barack Obama’s Secretary of Education pick. The organization is concerned about the possibility that Stanford professor Linda Darling-Hammond, who has criticized TFA and is chairing Obama’s education policy committee, could get a prominent role in the Obama administration.

In a mass e-mail today, Teach For America urged alumni to “stay on top of about [sic] what is happening and not happening regarding education reform at the national and local levels.” The e-mail (pasted below) also directed them to the Web site of TFA’s new political group, Leadership for Education Equity, where alumni are invited to post comments on several Web sites (including this one), saying, “Decision makers do watch online reactions.” We hope so!

This is the site’s main graphic:

Here’s the e-mail, after the jump:

Dear [Redacted],

Happy Thanksgiving!  As you’re all relaxing and celebrating with
friends and family this long weekend, you’ll undoubtedly discuss the
local and national politics of the day.  Toward that end, I want to
encourage all of you to check out LEE (www.educationalequity.org), our
501c4 sister organization (Leadership for Education Equity) that
supports Teach For America alumni interested in political engagement
and elected office.

As alumni and education reformers generally (regardless of our sector
or political affiliation), we must stay on top of about what is
happening and not happening regarding education reform at the national
and local levels; I truly believe LEE is synthesizing this information
better than any other source out there.  I especially want to
encourage all of you to read the article entitled: Wendy Kopp touted
for Obama Cabinet and to share with your fellow alumni your
perspectives on how President Elect Obama should staff and structure
his education team.

If you haven’t been on the site in a while (or yet), you can sign up
easily and/or use the “Forgot Password” function to change your
password or be reminded of your username.

Following on the November 15 New York City alumni summit, the Teach
For America New York City Alumni Affairs team will be following up
with many of you who indicated interest in getting involved in the
community organizing, local political engagement, and advocacy side of
things.

Before your December calendar fills up completely, I wanted to make
this particular opportunity — a citywide forum where you can voice
your perspective on mayoral control of the New York City public
schools — available to all of you:
http://gothamschools.org/2008/11/18/speak-out-about-mayoral-control/ .
Going forward, we’ll be posting many such opportunities on LEE, as
well.

Have a wonderful holiday.

My best,
Jessica

Jessica Cordova Kramer
Vice President, Alumni Affairs & District Strategy
Teach For America · New York City
519 8th Ave. – 15th Floor
New York, NY 10018
Tel. (212) 279-2666 x430
Fax (212) 279-2663www.teachforamerica.org

One day, all children in this nation will have the opportunity to
attain an excellent education.

Click here to unsubscribe or modify your email profile.
We respect your right to privacy – click here to view our policy.

This email was sent by: Teach For America
315 West 36th Street , New York , NY, 10018

  • Kevin Summers

    point of clarification: I think that email was sent only to TFA New York corps members and alumni. Unless, as a critical TFA Camden alum I’ve been blacklisted. In my experience the people that run the regional TFA offices sometimes take the initiative and say some idiotic things, esp. when it come to supporting Michelle Rhee.

  • Beth

    Does TFA and Kopp have no shame? Can you not recognize that TFA exists not to serve our schools but to serve Kopp’s ambition? Her intention and inclination has never been to do something for schools (you have to be an educator to understand what that entails). Her goal has always been to build a successful business. If you can not understand the world of difference that lies between these two entities, then you are perhaps a TFA candidate. Darling-Hammond is the real deal in terms of an educated person who CARES and KNOWS about teaching and learning. Kopp is a cheap copy. Stop pretending the problem of America’s schools can be solved with quick fixes. Unless you want to teach for the long run (the literature says it takes 3 years to get competent as a teacher — that happens one year after TFA participants are long gone — and 7-10 years to reach a level of excellence), then do our schools a favor and stay out of the classrooms. Get involved, by all means, just don’t do it through teaching. It doesn’t help kids learn, which is what matters in the long run.

  • James

    Beth –

    I respectfully disagree with your assessment of TFA. Wendy Kopp doesn’t believe this is a quick fix. In fact, the entire mission of Teach For America is to make sure that the best and brightest have a say in our education system (and those it has left behind) well beyond the two-year commitment. As a new corp member and a friend to many current corp members, I know that TFA requires an immense sacrifice from its members for their students. TFA teachers work especially hard to get their students even close to the academic abilities of their privileged peers. And they often do. You say “do our schools a favor” by staying out of the classroom, but what alternative do you suggest? The long-term (and usually uncertified) substitute teacher? Or should we cram the students into another teacher’s class? Are you really willing to toss out the best of our nation’s universities because they are only giving two years, especially when so many teachers in that environment just don’t care or have given up on their students? Do you know how many bad teachers are in our school systems because it’s virtually impossible to fire a bad teacher?

    Kopp and TFA have the courage to take on the mediocrity of the education schools that Darling-Hammond is undeniably a part of. TFA is not about ambition and personal gratification: It’s about the students and fixing the system. Let’s not forget that Darling-Hammond’s research was in one city (Houston) and the methodology has even been questioned by her own peers at Stanford. It would be a great disservice to the results of America’s brightest by having an enemy of TFA in the White House.

    I would do some thinking before insulting the extremely hard-working men and women who put their hearts and souls into their profession, if only for two years. It would not be where it is today (with some 24,000 applicants each year) if people didn’t think it was making a difference.

    Respectfully,
    James

  • Wendy Stevens

    I completely agree with Beth. Joe Klein, Michelle Rhee and Teach for America are all in the same boat and cut from the same cloth. Klein’s complete dependence on high stakes tests (which encourages cheating to stay alive as a teacher and principal), his manipulation of school principals, his packing the schools with unprepared teachers, his Draconian approach to budget making, his consistent lies about serious matters like the NYC drop our rate (close to 70% for African Americans and Latino’s according to the best respected expert–Gary Orfield), and his utter disrespect of parents by excluding them completely is a partial list of why making him Secretary of Education is the worst possible move for Obama on education. I suggest Linda Darling Hammond or almost any other talented educator–we don’t need a lawyer.

    It is also to be noted that under Klein’s watch, the NYC Department of Education:

    >>Adopted an unproven literacy program that ran contrary to federal guidelines;

    >>Set up new bus routes in midwinter that left children stranded;

    >>Failed to prevent schools from lying to parents who were told (falsely) that their children had to transfer to GED programs because the youngsters hadn’t accumulated sufficient credits in high school;

    >>Set up an accountability system that failed to articulate with Federal and State standards;

    >>Spent millions on a data-analysis system that is so overloaded that most teachers can’t access data unless they get online in the middle of the night;

    >>Continues to hire new, inexperienced teachers while forcing experienced, skilled and highly-paid senior teachers to serve as substitutes and hall-monitors;

    >>Spends five-million dollars a year on couriers;

    >>Failed to keep tabs on a Deputy Chancellor who pressured a school district into giving her unqualified husband a high-paying job.

    Last week, the City’s Comptroller charged the DOE of submitting misleading numbers when reporting cost-cutting efforts.

    Chancellor Klein’s leadership is questionable, to say the least. I’ve never heard a teacher speak well of him. President-elect Obama won the election because he is an inspirational leader. Joel Klein has drawn the ire of teachers and parents alike. Choosing him as Secretary of Education would be a provocative move.

    If Linda Darling-Hammond has Obama’s ear, which it is clear that he does from statements that Obama made on education just this past friday, it is highly unlikely that Joel Klein will be offered the position as Secretary of Education. It will most likely be Darling-Hammond herself, or someone like former Rhode Island Education Commissioner Peter McWalters. Or what about Dan Drmacich, Principal of School Without Walls and who has been instrumental in fighting against NCLB and standardized tests. If Obama wants to make change he will lean more toward an educator rather than making this position a political appointment.

    100 NYC public school parents signed this letter protesting Klein as a potential head of the Department of Education, and asking for educational leadership with real experience in schools.

  • Nicola

    James, ( I know, going back a bit)
    I have to disagree with you on point. You say that “In fact, the entire mission of Teach For America is to make sure that the best and brightest have a say in our education system (and those it has left behind) well beyond the two-year commitment”

    I just want to point out a particular individual who was a TFA memeber and is now involved in the education system. That of Michelle Rhee in the DC system. She is very adament on getting rid of tenure. She touts her education experience as being a TFA member, so she ‘knows’ what is going on in schools. This is taking away job security for teachers. You might see it as allowing bad teachers to be fired. I see it as a threat to my lively hood. What person would go into a professions where you are constantly in threat of being the first to go? That your 11 years of commitment are gone? You would NEVER see this attitude in the corporate buisness world, nor really in ANY profession other than wage paying jobs. The idea is to get better qualified more dedicated teachers into our classrooms, not discourage people from choosing a career path! Michelle Rhee did what most TFA members do, dable in the education system and call it experience. She was not looking at it as a career, nor as studies have pointed out do most TFA memebers (72%-100% leave after three years). She has no concept of teacher tenure and seniority because she didn’t use classroom teaching as a career. If you have a problem with ‘protecting bad teachers’ I do not think that discouraging teachers from sticking with teaching is a viable method to deal with the issue. Perhaps you should be lobying for union reform (oh yeah…you’d have to be a member of the teacher union to really have a say…), or perhaps beef up the education process for teachers. Make dispositions a requirement at education schools, do more to prepare teachers for the classroom. THIS is how you reform education. TFA is a stepping stone, it provides moderate stability for 2 years. To cite the ‘devil’ apparently for TFA, look at Darling-Hammond’s study. on 5 out of 6 test, students with TFA uncertified teachers did poorly compared to students with certified teachers.
    I for one do not want a repeate in Secretary of Education from 2002 where they call for the ending of certification. It’s been statistically proven to be necessary!

  • http://deborah.meier@gmail.com Deborah Meier

    The idea that Klein/Rhee et al represen “change” is not entirely bizarre. After all, some changes are bad. To abandon entirely the tradition of public education, the idea of democracy as the soundest form of accountability would be change of a sort; the concept that those who must implement policy should have a voice in making it and that we need above all to change the schools, classrooms and pedagogies that influence our children’s future IS “old-fashioned”–it’s been at the center of only very partially successful reform efforts for a century. In fact, democracy itself is an old-fashioned idea. Klein/et al want to firmly establish a view of schools as instruments of economic policy and parents and teachers as ultimately weak and unreliable guides. There are plenty of wise business analysts who would argue that Klein/Rhee thinking has led us into bad economics as well. It leads to fakery not facts.
    Darling-Hammond has been a steady, hard working agent for change of quite a different order. If we want to deepen our citizenry’s capacity to “rule”–she is indeed maybe even a radical reformer, hardly a defender of the status quo!!

  • Mike

    Nicola,

    I’m not sure if you follow the news or anything like that, but I liked when you said…

    “What person would go into a professions where you are constantly in threat of being the first to go? That your 11 years of commitment are gone? You would NEVER see this attitude in the corporate buisness world”

    People get fired from all types of jobs all the time!!! This has never been more true than right now and in no place is it more true than in corporations. Tenure is limited almost exclusively to teachers. You are so far out of touch that it is comical.

  • Danielle

    I am a former TFA corps member. I quit TFA just two weeks into Institute, the summer training program. Below I have provided some interesting information about certain aspects of Institute. Corps members are expected to work with very little sleep, often just a couple of hours a night. This is not conducive to effective training. The year before I joined, one corps member from my city was hospitalized during Institute as the result of exhaustion and pneumonia. At my Institute, another was forced to quit after developing a severe kidney infection. I felt that Institute would almost certainly have a negative impact on my physical health, and as a result would have a negative impact on my effectiveness as a teacher. When I brought up my concerns about health to my TFA School Director, he told me, “Sacrificing our health is something we do at Institute.” Besides the extreme physical demands, certain aspects of the content of the training are lacking or useless. At Institute, corps members are required to write every single one of their lesson plans word for word. For example, if you plan to say, “Good morning class. Today we are going to learn about fractions,” and then hang up a poster, you would have to write in your lesson plan, “Good morning class. Today we are going to learn about fractions,” and then note that you then plan to hang up a poster. I could never see how this was a good use of the extremely limited training time. Though corps members spend countless hours typing lesson plans word for word, Teach For America spends very little Institute time helping corps members become acquainted with the subject material that they will be teaching after Institute. This is likely because many corps members are not given their school or grade assignments until several weeks or even days before the beginning of the school year. I finally came to the conclusion that Teach For America was actively preventing me from becoming an effective teacher, which was why I had joined in the first place, and I made the decision to quit.

  • Richard

    Danielle –

    I am sorry to hear about your situation during institute. I am not a TFA corps member, but I have been to institute and it certainly is demanding. I have known many corps members that received plenty of sleep while at institute and went on to become effective teachers. At the same time, because everyone is discussing the professionalization of teaching, I know individuals that are training to be doctors, lawyers and businessman that sometimes receive little sleep. A friend who is currently an intern at a hospital has very odd sleeping hours. In saying that I definitely don’t want to judge your situation.

    There definitely are different philosophies as far as what it takes to teach a subject area effectively. If one is teaching 11th grade trigonometry, they should probably have a strong background in math. If one is teaching 5th or even 6th grade math, a math background probably isn’t that important.

    As one who taught at three different schools, my last stop was the most important. The VP at this school, who did do TFA, but also went on to get a degree at Teacher’s College after TFA, pushed me to script everything. It was one of the best lessons I ever learned in teaching. Through this I was able to keep myself grounded. I did not read the lesson plan like a script, but it allowed me to get back to what I was doing when or if I started to pontificate.

    Are you still teaching today?

  • Danielle

    I am still teaching, in a way. Since leaving TFA a year and a half ago, I have taken a position at a gymnastics center managing the girls recreational program, which has an annual peak enrollment of approximately 180 students. I spend 21 hours a week teaching. The other 19 hours are spent hiring and training staff, writing lesson plans, following up with parents, evaluating new students, etc. I plan to start an MBA program in the fall. Also, changing topics ( can’t figure out how to use the “enter” key to make paragraphs), I question sleep deprivation as a mark of professionalization. I pray that, should any of my loved ones ever fall ill, they are never placed under the care of a sleep-deprived resident. Changing topics once more, I can imagine that scripting might be useful for certain individuals in certain situations. I don’t think I needed it, and I think it kept me from doing other more valuable things with my Institute time.

  • http://www.ashleyperez.com Ashley Perez

    Hi all, I just wanted to follow up on a few threads here, although all have been interesting. Full disclosure: I was a TFA corps member in Houston from 2004-2006, after which I continued to teach for two more years before returning to graduate school.

    Danielle (of the bad TFA Institute experience), I’m wondering when you went through Institute. My experience in the summer of ’04 was, indeed, grueling. I would guess that I averaged 5-6 hours of sleep and was working literally every waking moment besides a 30-minute break at the gym. (That was also pretty much my schedule in my first year of teaching, too…) I ask because I’ve continued to be involved in TFA, including working as a faculty adviser at a site school for Houston Institute in 2007. I observed a number of improvements aimed at improving the efficiency, sleep patterns, and health of the TFA recruits. For example, when I was a corps member in Institute, we agonized for hours over lesson plans, turned them in a couple of days in advance of the lesson, got feedback from advisers, then spent the night before teaching that lesson completely redoing it. In ’07, they’d figured out that this model meant teachers didn’t sleep, which as you pointed out, is not conducive to stellar teaching (or learning, since at Institute CMs are in classes for about 6 hours a day, cramming pedagogy). So they had two-hour lesson plan workshop blocks with CMs’ advisers at night–teachers brought their lesson plans sometime during that time, got feedback “live,” and revised them there. When they left, they had a plan they could feel good about using, and they could go sleep.

    This may seem like a small change, but it’s reflective of how TFA works–observing problems, analyzing them, and busting it to make things work better. There’s no doubt that TFA calls for personal sacrifice; there’s really no other way to accelerate the learning curve so that people can become excellent educators in a year or two. At the same time, though, TFA advocates working smart, not blindly martyring yourself (which is unlikely to make good teachers). I saw (and did) a lot of both during my time in Houston, but the resources from TFA always pushed the smart model.

    I’d also like to link this back to Nicola’s comments regarding how TFA alums perceive teaching (i.e., is it a career or not?):

    “The idea is to get better qualified more dedicated teachers into our classrooms, not discourage people from choosing a career path! Michelle Rhee did what most TFA members do, dable in the education system and call it experience. She was not looking at it as a career, nor as studies have pointed out do most TFA members (72%-100% leave after three years).”

    It’s true that many TFA teachers do not stay teaching in their original placement beyond three years. (I won’t bother with the obvious logical problem of a statistical claim that extends to 100%…) Even if we define TFA alumni’s involvement in education very strictly, as in staying in K-12 education or administration in high-need areas, this is a choice many TFA alums are making _with the full support and encouragement of TFA_, which has worked to accelerate the path to principalships and to build partnerships with Education graduate programs so that former TFA members continue to develop their leadership and teaching abilities.

    That said, there’s also a good reason to look favorably on a young person who commits two years to teaching with TFA and then continues on to another career choice. For one thing, this short tenure allows the corps member to sustain high levels of commitment in his or her school during a time when he or she has fewer obligations than other staff members (in terms of marriage, children, care for elderly parents, etc.). In my case, that meant I could take on things–like early morning tutoring, after-school clubs, SAT-prep sessions, etc–that I couldn’t have in good conscience if I had a husband or family that would be shafted because of my long hours at school. Certainly in time one develops a balance for these things, but it’s difficult–and potentially (as Danielle noted) unhealthy–to maintain that TFA intensity forever.

    I am and will always be a teacher committed to working with students who don’t yet know how much they love to learn. My reasons for returning to graduate school so that I can teach English at a community college or university hinge on my commitment to effecting change in a way that I can sustain over my lifetime. For me, that means that I need a schedule that allows me to prep intensely for teaching 15-20 hours a week, work with students outside of class, and still have a family and do my own writing (check out my website if you’re curious about my YA novels).

    So what does this mean for the TFA model, which has always had the twin goals of developing excellent educators and inspiring people who feel called to go on to other careers to continue to advocate for education reform? I’d argue that the model respects both those who decide to become career educators and those who decide to do other things… and most importantly it calls on everybody to continue to use their experiences to break down stereotypes about the challenges in urban/rural schools and to push for better opportunities for all kids.
    Me, I’m cool with that.

  • Danielle

    In response to Ashley Perez’ comments:
    I attended the Los Angeles Institute in 2007. I have a friend who attended the 2007 Houston Institute. He likes TFA. What follows is a direct excerpt from an e-mail he sent me while at Institute:
    “yesterday, after logging
    4, 3, and .75 hours of sleep on three consecutive nights, i lost it. i
    was bright and coherent and full of this amazing inhuman energy on
    wednesday…until right after i finished teaching my class and went to a
    tfa session.

    suddenly i realized that the work i had been doing was COMPLETELY wrong
    and i had followed directions about as well as a kindergartener. i also
    realized that i didnt understand one word of what had been said in the
    last half of an hour. and then it occcured to me that i had been
    attempting to zip up a perfectly functional zipper on my tfa standard
    issue lunchbag for about a minute but wasnt making significant progress.
    my coordination was totally off. everyone stood up to leave, and when i
    joined i lost peripheral vision for a scary amount of time. then i
    somehow got a second wind and managed to go to another hour of class, 5
    hours of meetings, and 3 hours of paperwork before catching a deliciously
    luxurious (by tfa standards) 5 hours of sleep. i feel amazing now. fully
    rejuvinated.”
    Perhaps this is the sort of thing you were referring to when you used the term “martyring.” I think this is a poor use of the word. A martyr makes a voluntary sacrifice. The sleep deprivation of those at Institute generally is not voluntary.

  • JesseAlred

    I am seeking a dialogue with current and past Teach for America teachers. I have taught for 14 years in inner-city Houston. When I started teaching, I saw myself as a reformer, as some of Teach for America teachers do. I had some pretty serious success with AP students, and some serious frustration with our regular students. So my experience, to be honest, has been mixed. I want a dialogue about the political behaviors of the Teach For America elite.

    In our city, a former TFA official, now a school board member, has led the charge for beginning to fire teachers based on student test scores. She also opposed allowing teachers to select a single major union representative. After a little research I found this appeared to be a pattern with TFA”s leaders. There seems to be a close relationship between conservatives and the TFA elite.

    This goes back to its origins, when Union Carbide sponsored Wendy Kopp’s original efforts to create Teach For America. A few years before, Union Carbide’s negligence had caused the worst industrial accident in history, in Bhopal, India. The number of casualties was as large as 100,000, and Union Carbide did everything it could to avoid and minimize responsibility after the event.

    A few years later, when TFA faced severe financial difficulties, Ms. Kopp wrote in her book she nearly went to work for the Edison Project, and was all but saved by their financial assistance. The Edison Project, founded by a Tennessee entrepreneur, was an effort to replace public schools with corporate schools. Two brilliant TFA alumni, the founders of KIPP Academy, then joined the Bush’s at the Republican National Convention in 2000. This was vital to Bush, since as Governor he did not really have any genuine education achievements, and he was trying to prove he was a different kind of Republican. I then read the popular magazine articles about Michelle Rhee’s firing of teachers and closing of schools, and then her admission she had gone to far too fast.

    I think you do great work. Ironically, my former mentor works for Ms. Rhee. He saved me in my first year as a teacher in Houston. He was a terrific teacher. I respect and honor your work, as I do my own.

    But your leaders seem to attack the public sector and blame teachers for student failure in order to curry favor with rich conservatives. To be up front, I grew up in a low-income housing project in Mississippi and eventually became a good student, and I am a social democrat. I believe school reform must include better schools, but also health care, stable employment, long-term unemployment benefits, a revitalized union movement, a higher minimum wage, freedom for alternative lifestyles, and affirmative action. Stable families are more able to be ambitious for their kids than economically or emotionally unstable families. Better schools are part of this, but only one part of it. Your leaders seem to have gotten in bed with people who believe the market solves all issues—and that makes the money flow faster. Yet your hard work gives them credibility with the media.

    Ms. Kopp claims to be in the tradition of the civil rights movement, but Martin Luther King would take principled positions—against the Vietnam War and for the Poor Peoples March—even if they alienated powerful people. I would like a dialogue about what I have written here. My e-mail is JesseAlred@yahoo.com.

  • http://recoveringfromTFA.wordpress.com John Williamson

    ’m a recent TFA drop-out and I’m still reeling quite a bit from everything that happened to me. In a nut shell, I joined Teach For America in the 2010 school year as part of the new Detroit Corps. I got off to a fine start – survived Institute just fine (was actually an all-star of sorts – although I thought it was virtually worthless in terms of preparing us to actually teach), met great fellow Corps members, was placed in a great, manageable, small 5th grade class at a really cool, brand new charter school, but then things quickly spiraled out of control about a month into the school year. The school I was placed at didn’t meet their enrollment goals as a first-year school, so they couldn’t make their budget and as a result (despite doing a great job – I was still a first-year teacher), I was switched from my 5th grade class to a 2nd grade class within the school, which was horrible. The kids hated me for replacing their beloved former teacher, acted out like crazy every day and I had no clue what to do with a bunch of savage 7-year-olds (although I tried everything I knew how to do, which wasn’t very much). After an exhausting, saddening month of failing miserably and wanting to quit every day I was pretending to teach in this classroom (I was trained for high school math during Institute by the way and told all along I would be teaching high school), the charter school decided to let me go and bring back the old teacher (which was definitely 1,000,000 times better for those students so I’m glad for that). Two days later with only a few hours notice, I was thrown into an even worse 7th grade classroom environment in a Detroit public school (a class that had already driven out multiple teachers with their unmanageable behavior). I had no control or choice over this replacement as I went on my own to DPS HR to see what positions were available and I was denied efforts by TFA to defer for a year so I could teach 6th grade at the original charter school I was at. Having been utterly worn down by my 2nd grade experience, this class felt like walking back into a war zone and I guess my body/mind just couldn’t take anymore and saw no light at the end of the tunnel. At this point, I stopped sleeping for several days straight and started having major anxiety attacks from the stress and things just got worse and worse. After multiple hospitalizations, getting on numerous anti-anxiety medications (which I had never, ever taken before in my life) and a trip to the Detroit psych ward (where I was locked in for 7 hours), I finally resigned from TFA and began my recovery process.

    TFA and my PD through this whole process were worthless and did little except spout TFA-isms at me. I have many other problems and questions with what transpired in my TFA experience, including: “Why TFA thought it was ever a good idea to place Corps members at a first-year charter school that had a chance of not making its enrollment numbers hence guaranteeing they wouldn’t keep their original class no matter how great of a job they were doing?” and “Why TFA refused to let me defer for a year and come back to teach 6th grade at my original placement when this is what the school wanted, what I wanted and what would have been best for the 5th graders I was teaching?” These are just a couple of the questions pertinent to my experience that I wonder about on a regular basis. I’m definitely incredibly saddened and disheartened by my experience and resignation, since I very much thought I wanted to teach and be involved in education (I had worked for a college-access non-profit organization for the two years prior to joining TFA and loved it) and felt this was my pathway to do so. I certainly never had the mindset of “two years of this and then law school.” However, my situation obviously quickly became incredibly unhealthy for me and I know that if I am honest with myself, I am a million times happier now (I deliver pizzas and work with a special-needs kid in Detroit) than I was trying to teach in those 2nd grade and 7th grade classes…and that’s a reality that I’m still trying to grapple with and accept (although my having had a brief taste of teaching success in my original 5th grade class placement makes it all that much more bitter/sad to think about).

    In terms of what happened when I resigned, I wrote TFA a very honest, straight-forward, no-holds-barred resignation letter detailing how I was furious with them and felt that the organization repeatedly put me into awful situations through no fault of my own and that I had done everything I could and pushed myself to a very unhealthy psychological place and now needed to leave for mental health reasons. It also detailed how I could no longer support the organization as an education reform movement (a position I still absolutely hold, although I love and respect many of my fellow Corps members in Detroit – they are wonderful, hard-working people doing the best they can, but I know many of them are miserable and stressed out all the time and I doubt very many of them are more effective than traditionally trained teachers). The letter was bothersome enough to TFA staff that it earned me a meeting with the Director of TFA Detroit and other staff members –a meeting where they brought in physical print-outs of emails my PD had sent to me (as if that somehow proved how they actually had supported me enough) and asked me to re-write my resignation letter (I assume because they thought it looked bad and they had to send it on to national staff or something?). I also sent my story/resignation letter to several newspapers here in Detroit, started a “recovering from TFA” blog and am still on most TFA email lists. That was about it. I haven’t been in contact with anyone from TFA staff since my meeting although I imagine if a story about my experience gets published in a Detroit newspaper anytime soon, I will be hearing from them pretty quickly – can’t wait.

    Anyway, I would love to converse more with you or anyone else who reads this blog. My new website is “recoveringfromTFA.wordpress.com” (my resignation letters are posted there) and my email address is j.asher.williamson@gmail.com. I’m still pretty furious/upset/discouraged about everything that happened and it will doubtless take some more time to recover, but life goes on and I refuse to let this experience keep me out of being involved in education in some aspect in the future.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Feb. 10: You’re invited!

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

21 comments so far today

Our Twitter Updates

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829