Post a comment about the budget cuts at your school on our interactive comment map. more »
The City Council is about to review planned education cuts, but even if the Bloomberg administration is forced to make revisions, principals should absolutely plan for tighter days ahead. That will be difficult for the obvious reasons (who likes to spend less?) but also for this one: Many of today’s principals have never led through a downturn.
Earlier this week, I talked to a man who has: Eric Nadelstern, the head of the Empowerment network of schools and a Bronx principal from 1985 to 2000, a period that included a sharp fiscal downturn of about two years. In the last several months, Nadelstern has been offering advice to Empowerment principals on how to cut their budgets without making a dent in educational programming.
He shared three pieces of advice with me:
The truth is bringing in more students has significant costs in its own way — leading to higher class sizes, more overcrowding, and less time for each student to get the attention he or she needs to succeed.
Even though the state has now mandated that NYC schools aim to reduce class size, Nadelstern’s comments reflect how little the DOE takes these goals seriously — and how little they care about the need to provide a quality education for our kids.
Led through a downturn, or actually led a downturn? There are dozens of principals who were around a decade ago, but how many actually destroyed schools? Some of the worst schools in the City are the result of your interview’s work in creating scores of small disasters in the Bronx. On my blog I maintain a list of career-enders - schools so bad that no one should apply to them. And Nadlestern bears personally responsibility for starting most of them.
Sheesh, Elizabeth, other than blog comments, could you at least offer an opposing view in your article, for fairness? Plus, any administrator that talks “bodies” scares me.
3 Comments
Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack