GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

west side story

Backing her kid’s school, actress Cynthia Nixon joins UWS war

A resolution to move an Upper West Side middle school passed on Wednesday night, but not before Cynthia Nixon — “Sex and the City” actress, Alliance for Quality Education spokeswoman, and parent at the school — was shouted down briefly during a heated public comment session.

Nixon was stepping into a fight that has been raging on the Upper West Side for months. The fight began as a discussion about how to deal with overcrowding at public schools but has spiraled into a raging debate about class and race and privilege in Upper Manhattan. Confrontations have gotten incredibly emotional — and personal: On this site, a commenter posing as Cynthia Nixon’s fictional son, Brady, from “Sex and the City” accused his “mom” of hypocrisy. And parents at Nixon’s school, called the Center School, have charged another school’s parents with racism and class prejudice, citing postings from last January on the Urban Baby Web site that called Center School students “thugs.”

At issue is a plan that would move the Center School from its current home inside a larger elementary school on West 70th Street, PS 199. Supporters of the plan tout it as an easy way to relieve crowding at the elementary school, which is growing so quickly that parents fear it will not have room to hold their younger children. Opponents, including Nixon, argue that moving the Center School exacerbates segregation by race and class. (PS 199, a zoned school, is two-thirds white, while the Center School, which draws its students from throughout the district, is half white and has a higher proportion of black and Hispanic students.)

If the plan becomes official, which it almost certainly will after Wednesday’s vote, the Center School will move to another school building several blocks away.

Nixon and other Center School parents have vehemently opposed the plan for months, making fliers and using the school’s Web site to organize protests. They also delivered passionate testimony at the meeting Wednesday, choosing Nixon and another mother to represent their cause. In her short remarks, which I captured in the video above, Nixon argued that there is a stark difference between the demographic of the Center School and the “increasingly white and increasingly affluent” elementary school it shares space with. Moving the Center School away, she said, would lead to a “de facto segregated building on 70th Street.”

The Upper West Side school war began in September, when the city Department of Education suggested two plans for how the Upper West Side could relieve crowding.

One would have moved 30 percent of students to new schools. But the local parent council that has final authority over zoning matters last week indicated that it would back a much tamer plan. That one would move only a handful of students, keep siblings in the same school, and, most controversially, relocate two schools. One of those schools, Anderson, a gifted school that pulls students from across the city, agreed to a move. The other, the Center School, where Cynthia Nixon is a parent, has spent weeks fighting tooth and nail against the plan.

The people booing Nixon were led by a growing group of parents who are zoned for PS 199 but fear that increasing crowding could make the school too packed to have room for their children. If the Center School moves out of their building, that will shore up space for their children at PS 199. These parents, who have maintained a Web site that some say contains misinformation, turned out in large numbers to the meeting on Wednesday. (Below the jump, view a video of their spokesman, Eric Shuffler, speaking out at the meeting; he, too, was booed.)

But Nixon’s contingent was by far the largest. It included not only by Center School parents but also parents from at least four neighborhood schools, who echoed Nixon’s argument about diversity. The group walked out in protest as the council prepared to vote. A number of PS 199 parents who said they supported the Center School joined them.

Also walking out — at times to shouts of “Yes, we can” — were parents from the Computer School, a middle school whose building will be Anderson’s new home, and PS 75, a diverse elementary school whose zone was trimmed in the resolution.

Council members said they had no authority to involve issues of diversity in the rezoning process. “The [Community Education Council] does value diversity. We’ve talked about it,” CEC 3 member Jennifer Freeman told me after the meeting. “We were working with the tools available to us so the main topic in this conversation had to be overcrowding. We would welcome the opportunity to talk about diversity more.”

During the meeting, one council member explained that she wanted to deal with issues of race and class segregation in the district but that now was not the right time to do so.

“If not now, when?” audience members shouted at her.

That council member, Danielle Moss Lee, ultimately abstained from voting. She was the only council member present who did not vote in favor of the resolution.

  • to disgusted

    If you are a 199 parent look at your class list. It’s not that hard. and you really miss the point. The problem is next year more than this year. We need space for 7 K classes. and no, I don’t want a bigger school, but it is what it is. And 199 was intended to hold one elementary school when it was built.

  • disgusted

    Actually, I’m not missing the point. No one from 199 is willing to admit that 199 is not the most crowded school, and say why there should be a solution that only helps 199 (at the expense of another school). And, if overcrowding is as going to be as bad as forecasted, how is gaining the extra space more that a temporary fix? By the way, there are a lot of school buildings (intended for only one school) that house two or three schools in them.

    If the problem for you is only next year, and only 199, then I guess this is the fix for you.

  • Dear Disguted

    A simple Question: please explain how – if the CS stays – that HELPS our overcrowding situation?

  • disgusted

    A complex answer: Without a district wide change in zoning, there will come a time when the physical space of 199 will be too small. So, at some point, the school will have to put a cap on new students. The Center School leaving doesn’t change that. So, do you want to wait a couple of years down the line until 199 has become 800 students, or address that issue now?

    How CS staying helps: fewer students in the playground, and fewer students in the cafeteria for a start.

    When Elaine Schwartz and CS are gone, and you have to turn away those “neighborhood” kids, who are you going to blame? You will then have to look at the developers, CEC, DOE, city planners, and yourself.

    A simple question for you: Why should 199 be the only school to get relief when other schools are more crowded?

  • to disgusted

    No one is saying 199 should be the ONLY school to get relief, but we have to start somewhere. You are very defensive about this. If the school needs to get capped, it will, but it doesn’t need to yet. Frankly, it is not that traumatic to move a school every 26 years. people move all the time. You need to move on. No one is happy about this, but we need to start somewhere and rezoning will not have any effect for at least 5/6 years based on numbers. Good luck. I hope you still get into Center, but I don’t know if there will be enough room after sibs get in.

  • disgusted

    If you have to start somewhere, why not the most crowded school, or better yet a plan that helps more than one school? I didn’t say schools can’t move, but it doesn’t make sense if that move is only a temporary fix for one school’s benefit. If it is not so traumatic to move, you could move to a school that is less crowded. Good luck with that, since there are a lot of schools with bigger classes and less space.

  • Shut up

    Stop being such damn hypocrites.

    None of you cared about any of these issues until your poor little kids had to move schools (OH SO TRAUMATIC), and your principal threatened you with resignation.

    You don’t care now. You never did. You still don’t care.

    Shut up and move on. Teach your kids how to accept democracy for what it is, and to accept loss graciously.

  • The End

    DOE rules that the move of the Center School is official. Sorry for all the hurt feelings but it is time to move on.

  • Danielle Moss Lee, Ed.D.

    I believe the article above represents a gross misrepresentation of my sentiments regarding the need to address pervasive segregation in District 3 schools. I was deeply disappointed by the behavior and manipulations of parents on both sides of this issue at the meeting in question. The fact is that the evening became a slogan-fest that lost track of the real issues of overcrowding facing the district and the lack of developer accountability or taxation for school capital projects. But the reality of de jure segregration throughout this district to me was a separate issue from the need to relocate The Center School. There was no evidence to suggest that their physical co-existence with P.S. 199 had any impact whatsoever on the fact that P.S. 199 is incredibly white and privileged. It seemed to me that if segregation were the real issue here, the Center School parents could have pushed P.S. 199 and a nearby elementary school that largely serves public housing students in the area, to work on a desegregation plan together. Unbeknownst to most people in that room, when I first joined the CEC I told my colleagues and the superintendent that the district should take a strong look at its limited lack of progress in reducing racial and cultural segregation in its schools. I offered to host forums and to call on my numberous colleagues in the education and nonprofit sectors to help facilitate the creation of meaningful strategies. I provided each person on the CEC with a copy of Peggy Macintosh’s groundbreaking white paper on white privilege – Unpacking the Knapsack. I introduced everyone to the work The People’s Institute – a cross-sector consulting group that hosts a series of Undoing Racism workshops around the city. My expertise in the area and enthusiasm for the need to bring lasting change were met with general indifference. If Cynthia Nixon and the head of The Center School think voting against the move was a stand for equality in district 3 I say that is a pretty naive and narrow view. Anyone who knows anything about me or my career knows that the day I tell a group of entitled self-righteous white people that we can deal with racism “later”, hell will probably have frozen over. But I guess Elaine was too busy yelling in my face to let me finish my comments. I’m alot more savvy than the above article suggests. We cannot solve this issue without real public will and reflection, or without a cross-section of parents of every background who are committed and courageous enough to do what needs to be done. Yes, we can, Cynthia…but will we?

  • Michael D. Markowitz, P.E.

    Huzzahs to the above comment by DML.

    A little Googling later, here’s the paper, “Unpacking the Knapsack”: http://www.case.edu/president/aaction/UnpackingTheKnapsack.pdf

    Personally, and as the son of a former school board president who was instrumental in integrating the schools in my home town, I would most welcome a city-wide discussion of de facto segregation in New York City.

    But as long as there are “zoned” elementary schools — and a reasonable expectation that each New York City child deserves a high-quality elementary school within walking distance — the long overdue public conversation on desegration must not be conflated with the current overcrowding crisis.

    Shoving families around willy-nilly is neither an overcrowding solution nor a desegregation policy, even 55 years after Brown v Board of Ed. It’s just bad planning and bad public policy.

    http://brownvboard.org/programs/200905anniversary.htm

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Feb. 10: You’re invited!

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

20 comments so far today

Our Twitter Updates

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829