Post a comment about the budget cuts at your school on our interactive comment map. more »
The New York Times reported yesterday that anxiety over an impending rezoning of the Upper West Side had families frantic about whether their assigned neighborhood school could change overnight. Last night, the parent group that ultimately gets to approve any change took a step toward eliminating the worries, recommending a scaled-down rezoning that would affect only a small number of families.
Since the Department of Education first proposed rezoning the area in late September, some Upper West Side families feared being shut out of their neighborhood school, and at least one school, the Center School, railed against a plan that would require a handful of schools to relocate.
In a meeting last night that was closed to public comment, the Community Education Council for District 3 recommended that the Center School vacate the building it shares with PS 199, in which classes must be held in hallways, and move seven blocks south to PS 9. Space would be made available there by relocating the citywide gifted school, Anderson, to a middle school building on West 77 Street.
Center School administrators and parents oppose such a move, saying that the school has thrived in its current location, despite its tight quarters. But if the Center School doesn’t move, PS 199 would be able to have just two kindergarten classes next year, meaning that 75 percent of prospective families would be shut out, according to CEC 3 member Jennifer Freeman. “That’s too many kids to leave out” of a zoned school, Freeman said.
The school relocations appeared in one of the DOE’s two original proposals. But the CEC’s draft resolution departs from the DOE’s proposals by delaying the timeline for even the minor rezoning it recommends — a reduction in the size of the zone for PS 199, which this year had to open seven kindergarten classes — to 2010.
And the resolution reiterates the council’s call for a new school building to accommodate families moving into new buildings at the southern end of the district. The city’s new capital plan, released yesterday, doesn’t include any new schools for District 3, but Freeman told me she is “hopeful” that the DOE will still commit to building a new school.
Eric Shuffler, whose 4-year-old son would attend PS 199 next year, told me that parents are “grateful” that the CEC “clearly recognizes that the neighborhood children should receive priority to their neighborhood zoned school.”
At a CEC meeting next week, the DOE will present a new plan and the public will be able to comment on both the CEC’s and DOE’s proposals. The council will vote on a finalized plan at its Nov. 19 meeting, concluding the process in advance of the DOE’s Nov. 30 deadline.
Until then, parents at PS 199 and the Center School are likely to continue sparring. A message posted to the Center School’s parent Yahoo group this morning urged parents to write letters to the New York Times opposing the school’s relocation. In response, a parent zoned for PS 199 e-mailed a group of neighbors who have been active in fighting for the school: “I think we should go on a similar writing campaign thanking the CEC for doing the right thing.”
The full text of CEC 3’s draft resolution:
DRAFT * * * Resolution on School Overcrowding * * * DRAFT
District 3 Community Education Council (CDEC3)Whereas, CDEC3, as per CDEC3 Resolution of July 16, 2008, and New York State Education Law 2590-e.11, has worked with the New York City Department of Education (DOE) and the District 3 community to address overcrowding in the district through a process of working and public meetings, information gathering and public comment.
Whereas, the District 3 Community Education Council (CDEC3), has read, listened to and carefully analyzed reports and comments on the DOE school relocation and rezoning proposals, including those submitted verbally and in writing by parents, school community representatives, elected officials, and other community organizations, such as Community Board 7, and
Whereas, CDEC 3 agrees that making room for children to attend their neighborhood zoned schools and keeping families with siblings together are both high priorities, and
Whereas, CDEC 3 agrees that causing disruption to the smallest number of people for the shortest amount of time, while benefiting the largest number of people and adjusting school spaces and zones to match those schools’ expected level of enrollment, is a high priority, and
Whereas, CDEC 3 values allowing movement among district schools in order to maintain access to the rich tradition of educational choices already in place, and
Whereas, CDEC agrees that crowding/charter school issues in District 3 above 110th Street must be addressed, and
Whereas, CDEC 3 recognizes the need for pragmatic solutions to overcrowding to be implemented by September 2009; now therefore be it
Resolved that in light of the values expressed above, CDEC 3 recommends acceptance of a plan involving both relocations and zone changes, specifically: Relocation of MS 243 (The Center School) to the PS09 building; and relocation of PS/MS 334 (The Sarah Anderson School) to the MS 44 (O’Shea) building, with the understanding that DOE will demonstrate that adequate space exists for the Computer School and MS44 in their current location, and the Center School and the Anderson School to remain in their new buildings without any further disruption caused by population growth; and be it
Resolved that CDEC 3 recommends that the zone of PS199 be modified, effective in the 2010-2011 school year, so that its zoned population can fit into six kindergarten classes, providing that any zone line changes will take into account the ability of neighboring schools PS 191 and PS87 to expand their zoned populations slightly, and be it
Resolved that CDEC 3 recommends that other school zone lines be redrawn only where necessary to relieve current overcrowding and establish sustainable zone size (approval subject to analysis of DOE data), and be it
Resolved that CDEC 3 recommends that sibling preference be retained in the admissions system, while in the event that families are zoned out of their current school under this plan, siblings from those families will still be considered as siblings in the zone, and be it
Resolved that CDEC 3 recommends that any redrawing of zone lines fit a pragmatic pattern of serving specific community needs, rather than following a standard formula, and be it
Resolved that CDEC 3 recommends that the school relocation and rezoning be implemented in stages, with the relocation occurring in the summer prior to the 2009-10 year, and the minor rezoning the next year, in consultation with CDEC3, and be it
Resolved that CDEC 3 recommends that new schools be built and/or space be leased to accommodate the anticipated student population resulting from residential development in District 3, and that this be factored into the capital plan, and be it
Resolved that CDEC3 warmly thanks all those who joined in this difficult process of balancing the choices available.
What is the fastest way to get a new school built? Tell the kids living in the Trump buildings that they’re going to PS 191 next year!
This proposed plan including moving Center School is the only way to keep PS199 a great neighborhood school. And in addition it is a win win - the Center school is pushing the boundaries of their space. Moving is not easy, but being shut out 9 months before the school year is not acceptable.
It can take over 5 years for a new school to be approved, designed, built and become open to the local community - even assuming everyone agrees to this now - so this won’t solve anything immediately, anyway. More importantly, why target (discriminate against?) any particular group. All kids from our neighborhood are entitled to a good education, regardless if they live in an ugly building or not.
The Center School has been and continues to be the single biggest obstruction to an immediate, efficient and effective solution to the overcrowding problem. It should not go unnoticed that they have not given any reason that they should not move other than “we dont want to” or “it will be disruptive”. And most obvious point that everyone seems to miss is that wherver that school is located, it as a school, will remain entirely intact. If PS199 is rezoned, its student body and surrounding community will be fragmented. That is what rezoning is. Center School is a school of adolescent and near-adolescent kids that mostly commute. Shame on them for suggesting that zoned PS199 students, woh being school as TODDLERS, be bused to inferior schools so that Center School can continue to borrow space at PS199.
I applaud the CEC’s draft resolution. The principle that neighborhood children deserve to attend their local zoned school should always be paramount in any discussion. The Center School, as fine a school as it is, is not a zoned school, and should not operate in a way that shuts out zoned Kindergarteners and forces them to travel to other areas in the District. It’s never easy to relocate or move, but I imagine that 12 and 13 year olds can handle that better than 4 and 5 year olds. Thank you, CEC!
I fully support relocating the Center School, a district wide middle school. Kindergarteners deserve to go to their local elementary school.
I agree that it makes sense for the Center School to move, but doesn’t it make much more sense for the Center School to move to the MS 44 building rather than Anderson. The latter school is a K-8 school that is a CITYWIDE G&T program. There is absolutely no reason to house this school in District 3. Further, why have elementary students coming into a school with two middle schools in it? It will wreak havoc on the Computer School’s and MS 44’s schedules. The Center School, in contrast, is a middle school that is similar in diversity and philosophy to The Computer School and would be a much better match for sharing the building.
Eric Shuffler is a lobbyist. He has worked for Christine Quinn, as well as numerous politicians in NJ. Are you sure he is a prospective parent and not just a hired lobbyist?
Eric is a prospective parent. A professional lobbyist would be in deep trouble for false impersonation. Such shameful tactics are The Center School’s bailiwick.
Eric Shuffler is not only a “prospective”parent at 199. He is also a HIRED LOBBYIST for the school.
Eric and Serenity are HIRED LOBBYISTS and DOORMEN for the school. Take that unsubstantiated meaningless comment!
P.S. 191 is not a bad school. No it is not as high achieving as P.S. 199 but that is because it pulls from a predominately lower socio-economic pool. Studies show that children from lower socio-economic areas perform lower on standard test due to the long term effects of being poor. There are studies, look them up. I think that P.S. 191 has help a lot of their children get through some of those problems during the academic day. P.S. 191 gets a bad rap otherwise. Ask any teacher one way to tell a good school is their teacher turnover rate. If it is high - run! If it is low, you will have a hard working dedicated staff. P.S. 191 has a low turn over. There is no reason why the newer Trump buildings can’t be zones for P.S. 191. Let’s see I can have my child be 1 of 16 in a Kindergarten class at P.S. 191 or 1 out of 25 at P.S. 199. I am going to go with the place that has more attention to give to my child.
If i am in ps199 catchment can I just send my kids to ps191? how does that work ? do i have to request to go there?
How bout feedburner? works well with wordpress and keeps scrappers from stealing your stuff from what i heard on a forum recently. with good content like this you might check it out.
14 Comments
Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack